“…Nephelometers use light scattering to measure water quality, while turbidimeters use light absorption . Both devices are widely used and present similar limitations. ,− First, these methods measure relative light intensity to extract turbidity readings, and thus cannot distinguish between contaminants. , Second, nephelometers and turbidimeters perform poorly when measuring very small particles that scatter less light, especially when present in low concentrations. , Finally, different nephelometers and turbidimeters may have different optical systems that can affect the accuracy of the measurements, and the use of formazin as a normalization standard can be problematic because it can become less stable as the concentration of contaminants decreases. ,, To overcome these challenges, we suggest a new method that relies on the optical properties of the contaminants to verify their concentration. Since the contaminants scatter and absorb light, we suggest using the full scattering profile (FSP) and utilizing the appearance of the iso-pathlength (IPL) point to accurately measure contaminant concentration.…”