2022
DOI: 10.1109/tim.2022.3180421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Real-Time Water Quality Measurement Instrument for Simultaneously Detecting Turbidity and Particle Size by Using Single-Photon Counting Technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nephelometers use light scattering to measure water quality, while turbidimeters use light absorption . Both devices are widely used and present similar limitations. , First, these methods measure relative light intensity to extract turbidity readings, and thus cannot distinguish between contaminants. , Second, nephelometers and turbidimeters perform poorly when measuring very small particles that scatter less light, especially when present in low concentrations. , Finally, different nephelometers and turbidimeters may have different optical systems that can affect the accuracy of the measurements, and the use of formazin as a normalization standard can be problematic because it can become less stable as the concentration of contaminants decreases. ,, To overcome these challenges, we suggest a new method that relies on the optical properties of the contaminants to verify their concentration. Since the contaminants scatter and absorb light, we suggest using the full scattering profile (FSP) and utilizing the appearance of the iso-pathlength (IPL) point to accurately measure contaminant concentration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nephelometers use light scattering to measure water quality, while turbidimeters use light absorption . Both devices are widely used and present similar limitations. , First, these methods measure relative light intensity to extract turbidity readings, and thus cannot distinguish between contaminants. , Second, nephelometers and turbidimeters perform poorly when measuring very small particles that scatter less light, especially when present in low concentrations. , Finally, different nephelometers and turbidimeters may have different optical systems that can affect the accuracy of the measurements, and the use of formazin as a normalization standard can be problematic because it can become less stable as the concentration of contaminants decreases. ,, To overcome these challenges, we suggest a new method that relies on the optical properties of the contaminants to verify their concentration. Since the contaminants scatter and absorb light, we suggest using the full scattering profile (FSP) and utilizing the appearance of the iso-pathlength (IPL) point to accurately measure contaminant concentration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 4 Both devices are widely used and present similar limitations. 3 , 5 7 First, these methods measure relative light intensity to extract turbidity readings, and thus cannot distinguish between contaminants. 2 , 3 Second, nephelometers and turbidimeters perform poorly when measuring very small particles that scatter less light, especially when present in low concentrations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation