2015
DOI: 10.1111/boer.12052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A RE‐EXAMINATION OF REAL INTEREST PARITY IN CEECs USING ‘OLD’ AND ‘NEW’ SECOND‐GENERATION PANEL UNIT ROOT TESTS

Abstract: HAL is a multidisciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of scientific research documents, whether they are published or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers. L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des labora… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are, to some extent, comparable to those obtained by Sonora and Tica (2014) and Albulescu et al (2016). Similarly, we find that real interest rate differentials exhibit significant instabilities, and although in general the interest rate parity holds for the CEE countries, there are exceptions to this rule.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results are, to some extent, comparable to those obtained by Sonora and Tica (2014) and Albulescu et al (2016). Similarly, we find that real interest rate differentials exhibit significant instabilities, and although in general the interest rate parity holds for the CEE countries, there are exceptions to this rule.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The authors conclude that the real interest rates generally reverse to the parity over the period 1996-2011, both against the EMU and the US 1 . These results, however, are only partly confirmed by Albulescu et al (2016) who highlight the sensitivity of real interest rates stationarity to the choice of benchmark rates, as well as the shortcomings of panel unit root tests.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Besides, Pesaran [24] is robust when time-series' heteroscedasticity is observed in the unobserved common factor [53]. Even though theoretically Moon and Perron [45], Choi [54] and Pesaran [24] require large N and T, Pesaran [24] is uniquely robust in small sample sizes [55]. Therefore, this study employs the CIPS test to take into account CD, heteroskedasticity in the unobserved common factor and both large and small sample countries.…”
Section: Unit Root Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(), Byrne and Nagayasu (), Tsong and Lee (), Albulescu et al . (), Chang and Su (), and Corakci et al . () used different panel unit root tests and again, supported the parity hypothesis across most pairs of countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…They supported the stationarity for some pairs and rejected it for some other pairs. Suspecting that univariate unit root tests suffer from low power, Camarero et al (2010), Byrne and Nagayasu (2012), Tsong and Lee (2013), Albulescu et al (2016), Su (2015), andCorakci et al (2017) used different panel unit root tests and again, supported the parity hypothesis across most pairs of countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%