1958
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330160106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A re‐evaluation of estimation of stature based on measurements of stature taken during life and of long bones after death

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

8
426
4
21

Year Published

1968
1968
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 756 publications
(479 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
8
426
4
21
Order By: Relevance
“…= (6 * 23 x 10) + 4 * 66 = 66 * 96 cm. The standard deviations of error (Sr) of the estimation of height from foot length are of the same order as those found by Trotter and Gleser (1958) for American adult men, and those found by Zorab et al (1963) for 13-year-old children, for the estimation of height from the length of the long bones.…”
Section: Prediction Of Height From Foot Lengthsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…= (6 * 23 x 10) + 4 * 66 = 66 * 96 cm. The standard deviations of error (Sr) of the estimation of height from foot length are of the same order as those found by Trotter and Gleser (1958) for American adult men, and those found by Zorab et al (1963) for 13-year-old children, for the estimation of height from the length of the long bones.…”
Section: Prediction Of Height From Foot Lengthsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Investigators have studied the relation between height and the length of various long bones (Dupertius and Hadden, 1951; Trotter andGleser, 1952, 1958;Zorab, Prime, and Harrison, 1963), and have found good correlation between these measurements. The accurate measurement of height under field survey conditions is extremely difficult, but can provide valuable information.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The length of the jinniushan ulna fits much better among the male values than among females of many European or Euroamerican recent human samples (see for example Trotter and Gleser, 1958;Olivier, 1969;Krogman and Iscan, 1986) and yields a height of 170.2 cm using Trotter's (1970) formula for Euroamerican men, a value more in line with the SH and Neandertal males. Although there may be some questions regarding the sexual diagnosis of these three ulnae (Sidron, SH Ulna XII andjinniushan) as well as potentially different limb proportions of the individuals to whom they belong, these results underline the importance of correct sexual diagnosis of fossil remains when making palaeobiological interpretations.…”
Section: Comparisons With Other Homo Taxamentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The height estimates for the species Homo antecessor are based on the Trotter and Gleser (1958) formulae and relied on either incomplete long bones (radius) or bones not especially well related with stature (clavicle and metatarsal 11) (Carretero et al, 1999). Given these caveats, the mean of the three estimates is 172.6 cm (sOM , Table 51.16).…”
Section: Comparisons With Other Homo Taxamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation