A Rational Approach to Estimating the Surgical Demand Elasticity Needed to Guide Manpower Reallocation during Contagious Outbreaks

Abstract

BackgroundEmerging infectious diseases continue to pose serious threats to global public health. So far, however, few published study has addressed the need for manpower reallocation needed in hospitals when such a serious contagious outbreak occurs.AimTo quantify the demand elasticity of the major surgery types in order to guide future manpower reallocation during contagious outbreaks.Materials and MethodsBased on a nationwide research database in Taiwan, we extracted the monthly volumes of major surgery types for the period 1998–2003, which covered the SARS period, in order to carry out a time series analysis. The demand elasticity of each surgery type was then estimated by autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) analysis.ResultsDuring the study period, the surgical volumes of most selected surgery types either increased or remained steady. We categorized these surgery types into low-, moderate- and high-elastic groups according to their demand elasticity. Appendectomy, ‘open reduction of fracture with internal fixation’ and ‘free skin graft’ were in the low demand elasticity group. Transurethral prostatectomy and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) were in the high demand elasticity group. The manpower of the departments carrying out the surgeries with low demand elasticity should be maintained during outbreaks. In contrast, departments in charge of surgeries mainly with high demand elasticity, like urology departments, may be in a position to have part of their staff reallocated.ConclusionsTaking advantage of the demand variation during the SARS period in 2003, we adopted the concept of demand elasticity and used a time series approach to figure out an effective index of demand elasticity for various types of surgery that could be used as a rational reference to carry out manpower reallocation during contagious outbreak situations.

Sustainable practice of ophthalmology during COVID-19: challenges and solutions

“…Thus, these contingency requirements, though previously unthinkable, may require planning and forethought. To achieve this, our department has undertaken superfluous staffing to cater to the differing elasticities of manpower demand during this crisis [44] by restricting all leave and conference attendances.…”

Exploring the Impact of COVID‐19 on Progress Towards Achieving Global Surgery Goals

“…There is a delicate balance to be struck between social distancing and the detrimental effects on surgical services. The current surgical rationing thresholds are The manner in which these key actors relate and engage with another to influence health delivery Formulation of policies, regulations, and national budgets based on an estimation of surgical urgency; however, an approach that considers demand elasticity for surgical procedures and size of waiting lists rather than just an urgency classification may help mitigate against large postpandemic backlogs [28]. Recently published data from the COVIDSurg collaborative show that an estimated 28 million surgical operations will be cancelled, and disturbingly LMICs will bear the brunt of these cancellations [29].…”

”For this one, let me take the risk”: why surgical staff continued to perform caesarean sections during the 2014–2016 Ebola epidemic in Sierra Leone

“…High-income settings can also be exposed to outbreaks and might face similar challenges to CS or surgical provision. For example, a Taiwanese study suggests that the need for emergency surgery persisted whereas that for elective surgery decreased following the 2002–2003 severe acute respiratory syndrome outbreak 56. However, our findings might not apply to the trauma-heavy surgical need resulting from natural disasters and armed conflict 53 57…”