2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2004.11.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A rate equation approach to the gas sensitivity of thin film metal oxide materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
87
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
5
87
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are consistent with previously observed sensing behavior in porous films which exhibit an asymmetric bell-shaped variation of the gas sensitivity with the sensor operation temperature [15]. The temperature at which the maximum sensitivity occurs is also dependant on the concentration of the gas [15].…”
Section: B Gas Sensing Measurementssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These results are consistent with previously observed sensing behavior in porous films which exhibit an asymmetric bell-shaped variation of the gas sensitivity with the sensor operation temperature [15]. The temperature at which the maximum sensitivity occurs is also dependant on the concentration of the gas [15].…”
Section: B Gas Sensing Measurementssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The temperature at which the maximum sensitivity occurs is also dependant on the concentration of the gas [15]. The resistance changes observed in the sensor are due to the temperature dependant chemisorption of at the surface of the .…”
Section: B Gas Sensing Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The difference observed in these two parameters (α, S) as well as the dissimilar behaviour of the sensitivity as function of the temperature (Fig.5b) are a direct proof that the surface chemistry is significantly different in the two metal oxides, since the response modulation as function of the diameter is considered a second order effect in this diameter range (d > 100 nm) [31]. Actually, the bell-shaped form of the response with increasing surface temperature in MOX was explained by Ahlers et al [32] in terms of two competing surface processes and as a consequence the experimental curve for SnO 2 and CuO nanowires can be parameterised by means of two energetic parameters: the strength of Langmuir adsorption E ads of the NH 3 molecule at the surface, and the activation energy for the combustion reaction E RES . These two factors are thus the decisive parameters to explain the high-temperature drop-off of S. Despite the complete description of the NH 3 -CuO interaction mechanism is beyond the scope of this preliminary work, it can be concluded from the dissimilar response-to-temperature profile and assuming that E ads is comparable in both metal oxides that the activation energy E RES is larger for SnO 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Interestingly, when properly choosing the operating temperature, the sensor demonstrated the opposite response to CO and NO 2 , respectively. The ability to distinguish between NO 2 and CO when employing low and high operation temperatures is due to the well-known bell-shaped response curves of metal oxide gas sensors [21] and the commonly lower detection temperatures for the case of NO 2 . Therefore, we tested the sensor at two different temperatures, chosen for maximizing the sensitivity and selectivity toward CO and NO 2 .…”
Section: Sensing Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%