2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A rat model for measuring the effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation using fMRI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
53
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this phase, four studies were excluded: one study used tDCS in mouse slices, thus not characterizing in vivo assessment (Fritsch et al , 2010 ); three studies delivered non-constant currents (Kabalak et al , 2005 ;Nekhendzy et al , 2006 ;Ozen et al , 2010 ). The study by Nekhendzy et al (2004) healthy animals, measuring its effects on cerebral blood fl ow (Wachter et al , 2011 ), motor excitability (Cambiaghi et al , 2010 ), neuroimaging (Takano et al , 2011 ), safety limits of electric charges (Liebetanz et al , 2009 ) and visual attention task (Schweid et al , 2008 ), or in pathologic models of stroke (Kim et al , 2010 ), epilepsy (Liebetanz et al , 2006b ;Kamida et al , 2011 ), cortical spreading depression (Liebetanz et al , 2006a ;Fregni et al , 2007 ), cerebellar lesion (Ben Taib and Manto , 2009 ) and pain (Nekhendzy et al , 2004 ) (Table 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this phase, four studies were excluded: one study used tDCS in mouse slices, thus not characterizing in vivo assessment (Fritsch et al , 2010 ); three studies delivered non-constant currents (Kabalak et al , 2005 ;Nekhendzy et al , 2006 ;Ozen et al , 2010 ). The study by Nekhendzy et al (2004) healthy animals, measuring its effects on cerebral blood fl ow (Wachter et al , 2011 ), motor excitability (Cambiaghi et al , 2010 ), neuroimaging (Takano et al , 2011 ), safety limits of electric charges (Liebetanz et al , 2009 ) and visual attention task (Schweid et al , 2008 ), or in pathologic models of stroke (Kim et al , 2010 ), epilepsy (Liebetanz et al , 2006b ;Kamida et al , 2011 ), cortical spreading depression (Liebetanz et al , 2006a ;Fregni et al , 2007 ), cerebellar lesion (Ben Taib and Manto , 2009 ) and pain (Nekhendzy et al , 2004 ) (Table 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an animal study, anodal stimulation on frontal cortex induced neuronal activation in the frontal cortex and its associated brain regions [69]. In human studies, when anodal stimulation was applied to dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, the synchrony in the anticorrelated network components increased and the synchrony in the default mode network components decreased, which means that the intrinsic brain activity network reconfiguration occurred after tDCS [70].…”
Section: Modulation Of Functional Connectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the 20-minute session of anodal tDCS, the animals remained gently wrapped in a towel. The anodal electrode was placed between the ears, on the neck of the rat (parietal cortex), and the cathodal electrode was positioned at the midpoint between the lateral angles of both eyes (supraorbital area) 18,19,25 . This technique mimics tDCS protocols used in humans 26,27 , and it has been applied by our research group showing antinociceptive effects 18,19 .…”
Section: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (Tdcs)mentioning
confidence: 99%