2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12070-019-01656-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Rare Case of Ossifying Fibroma with Cystic Degeneration: Diagnostic Challenge with Literature Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the ABC remains the most frequently reported type of cystic degeneration associated to COF, non-specific cyst degeneration might be observed [4] . As presented in our case report, the secondary changes, which although appeared filled with cystic liquid and lacked epithelial lining, does not meet the diagnostic need for SBC or ABC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Although the ABC remains the most frequently reported type of cystic degeneration associated to COF, non-specific cyst degeneration might be observed [4] . As presented in our case report, the secondary changes, which although appeared filled with cystic liquid and lacked epithelial lining, does not meet the diagnostic need for SBC or ABC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors point that fibro-osseous lesions with concomitant SBC or cystic degeneration require aggressive management [7] . In several cases surgical resection was the management option, in these cases cystic degeneration consisted of ABCs [4] , [6] , [13] and non-specific cystic degeneration [7] . One case reported, considering the benign nature of the lesion, radiological and clinical monitoring as management option [5] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Sin embargo, se han reportado lesiones radiolúcidas en pacientes mayor edad en lesiones de FCO (9) . Con respecto a la locularidad de los FO y FCO, la mayoría de las lesiones de la presente revisión fueron uniloculares (19)(20)(21)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)45,46,48) . Esto se condice con la literatura, que señala una relación de lesiones uniloculares / multiloculares de 5:1.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified