2012
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-7769
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Randomized Trial Using Progressive Addition Lenses to Evaluate Theories of Myopia Progression in Children with a High Lag of Accommodation

Abstract: The statistically significant, but clinically small, PAL effect suggests that treatments aimed at reducing foveal defocus may not be as effective as previously thought in myopic children with high accommodative lag. Finding no evidence of treatment loss after discontinuing PAL wear supports hyperopic defocus-based theories such as accommodative lag; however, not finding an association between accommodative lag and myopia progression is inconsistent with the PAL effect being due to decreased foveal blur during … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

6
119
0
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
6
119
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…According to our model, under-correction of myopia should reduce the progression of myopia only slightly, since the eye is still substantially corrected. Reports of the effect of under-correction, for distance and near, are varied as the following reports exemplify [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. The conflicting results may be due to the small effect of under-correction and the difficulty of the experiment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to our model, under-correction of myopia should reduce the progression of myopia only slightly, since the eye is still substantially corrected. Reports of the effect of under-correction, for distance and near, are varied as the following reports exemplify [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. The conflicting results may be due to the small effect of under-correction and the difficulty of the experiment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, orthokeratology (OK) is the most effective non-pharmacological method in slowing down myopia progression compared to the use of single-vision spectacle lenses (SV) [3][4][5], bifocal spectacles [6], progressive addition lenses [7,8], soft lenses [9], and rigid gas-permeable contact lenses (RGP) [10]. However, the biggest challenge is to identify those children who may benefit from the use of OK. Investigators have tried to identify the factors affecting the efficacy of OK in myopic control such as initial age [11][12][13][14], spherical equivalent refractive errors (SER) [11][12][13][14][15], pupil diameter [13,16], age of myopia onset [13], myopia progression 2 years before baseline [13], anterior chamber depth [13], and parental refraction [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…В настоящее время у детей и подростков для коррек-ции и контроля миопии применяются различные виды оптических средств коррекции зрения [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15], в том чис-ле ортокератологические линзы (ОКЛ) [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Извест-но, что для создания рефракционного эффекта в дизай-не ОКЛ используется принцип «обратной» геометрии.…”
unclassified