2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.10.888
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomized trial of vitamin D supplementation in 2 community health center networks in South Carolina

Abstract: Objective-To determine whether 4000 IU vitamin D 3 /day (vs. 2000 IU/day) during pregnancy is safe and improves maternal/neonatal 25(OH)D in a dose-dependent manner.Study Design-257 pregnant women 12-16 weeks' gestation were enrolled. Randomization to 2000-vs. 4000 IU/day followed one-month run-in at 2000 IU/day. Participants were monitored for hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia and 25(OH)D status.Results-Maternal 25(OH)D (n=161) increased from 22.7(SD 9.7) at baseline to 36.2(SD 15) and 37.9(SD 13.5) in the 2000-a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
114
0
7

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(62 reference statements)
6
114
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are in marked contrast to the results of a recent report involving several thousand subjects consuming up to 10 000 IU vitamin D per day for 1.5 years that demonstrated no relationship with renal stones. 44 In our studies, we have never observed an event of hypercalciuria associated with vitamin D intake or circulating levels of 25(OH)D. 7,8,40,41 Concern remains about vitamin D toxicity as it relates to mortality. 45 A recent metaanalysis by Garland et al on the subject, however, clearly demonstrated increased all-cause mortality at low circulating levels with no such relationship at higher levels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings are in marked contrast to the results of a recent report involving several thousand subjects consuming up to 10 000 IU vitamin D per day for 1.5 years that demonstrated no relationship with renal stones. 44 In our studies, we have never observed an event of hypercalciuria associated with vitamin D intake or circulating levels of 25(OH)D. 7,8,40,41 Concern remains about vitamin D toxicity as it relates to mortality. 45 A recent metaanalysis by Garland et al on the subject, however, clearly demonstrated increased all-cause mortality at low circulating levels with no such relationship at higher levels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…39 An Investigational New Drug application to the US Food and Drug Administration was mandated to conduct both the current study and our pregnancy vitamin D supplementation trials. 40,41 Since that time, the IOM has increased the upper limit to 4000 IU per day, 1 and the Endocrine Society set the upper limit at 10 000 IU/day. 42 During the past decade several studies, including our own, were performed using our original Food and Drug Administration Investigational New Drug application involving several thousand patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Randomized controlled trials of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy have clarified issues related to optimal dosing and safety (Wagner et al, 2013b, Wagner et al, 2013a but larger trials will be needed in order to focus on the range of adverse health outcomes associated with gestational vitamin D deficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5] Recently, two new randomized controlled studies showed that a daily intake of higher (4000 IU per day) vitamin D resulted with higher circulating 25-OHD levels in pregnant women compared with low doses (200 IU per day and 2000 IU per day). 6,7 Therefore, it was suggested that higher vitamin D supplementation might be required for prevention of hypovitaminosis D and achievement of normal circulating 25-OHD levels (40 to 60 ng ml -1 ) during pregnancy, which would also decrease the incidence of co-morbidities of pregnancy. 8,9 A more recent study showed that lower maternal 25-OHD levels were associated with increased risk of dental caries in infants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%