2014
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.8051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomized phase 2 trial of MM-121, a fully human monoclonal antibody targeting ErbB3, in combination with erlotinib in EGFR wild-type NSCLC patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The addition of lumretuzumab may have caused an increase in the incidence of diarrhea compared with the incidence for cetuximab monotherapy [77.6% (any grade) and 12.2% (grade !3) compared with 12.7% (any grade) and 1.2% (grade !3) for cetuximab monotherapy (35)] and erlotinib monotherapy [76.1% (any grade) and 15.5% (grade !3) compared with 55% (any grade) and 6% (grade !3) for erlotinib monotherapy (36)]. The severity of diarrhea seemed increased at the highest lumretuzumab doses tested, that is, at 1,600 and 2,000 mg. A similar diarrhea side effect profile as in the current study was seen for combination treatments of other HER3-targeting antibodies with cetuximab (37,38) and erlotinib (38)(39)(40) in early clinical studies. Effects might be caused by a disinhibition of HER-modulated chloride channels in colonic epithelial cells leading to secretory diarrhea (41,42).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The addition of lumretuzumab may have caused an increase in the incidence of diarrhea compared with the incidence for cetuximab monotherapy [77.6% (any grade) and 12.2% (grade !3) compared with 12.7% (any grade) and 1.2% (grade !3) for cetuximab monotherapy (35)] and erlotinib monotherapy [76.1% (any grade) and 15.5% (grade !3) compared with 55% (any grade) and 6% (grade !3) for erlotinib monotherapy (36)]. The severity of diarrhea seemed increased at the highest lumretuzumab doses tested, that is, at 1,600 and 2,000 mg. A similar diarrhea side effect profile as in the current study was seen for combination treatments of other HER3-targeting antibodies with cetuximab (37,38) and erlotinib (38)(39)(40) in early clinical studies. Effects might be caused by a disinhibition of HER-modulated chloride channels in colonic epithelial cells leading to secretory diarrhea (41,42).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…28 Most recently, evidence from phase 2 clinical trials has suggested that adding an anti-HER3 antibody to other systemic anticancer agents leads to increased progression-free survival in various tumor types, including ovarian, 29 breast, 30 and non-small cell lung cancer. [31][32][33] These data clearly support the role of heregulin and anti-HER3 targeting in patients with HNSCC. However, to the best of our knowledge, there currently is very little information regarding the prognostic value of heregulin in patients with HNSCC.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Several clinical trials have now linked heregulin expression with rapid disease progression during the receipt of standard therapy as well as an improved response to HER3-targeted therapies in various tumor types, including ovarian, breast, and non-small cell lung cancers. [29][30][31][32][33] In preclinical models of HNSCC, we found that seribantumab (MM-121), a fully human antibody that blocks heregulin binding to HER3, exhibits an antitumor activity either alone or in combination with cetuximab. 27 Collectively, these findings strongly support the clinical investigation of HER3directed therapy in patients with HNSCC whose tumors exhibit high levels of heregulin mRNA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many therapeutic agents targeting HER3 have demonstrated promising results in preclinical studies, whereas the clinical use of those agents has not resulted in meaningful benefits . In contrast, the U3‐1402 anti‐HER3 antibody (patritumab) conjugated with topoisomerase demonstrated impressive efficacy with a 48% response rate in patients with HER3‐positive pretreated breast cancer .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We reported that its efficacy depends on heregulin level in cancer cells, as is generally observed for anti‐HER3 agents . Furthermore, some studies on anti‐HER3 antibodies such as seribantumab demonstrated their efficacy in patients with heregulin‐positive cancer; however, other clinical trials on anti‐HER3 antibodies did not report obvious relationships between efficacy and heregulin levels . Therefore, the clinical relationship between anti‐HER3 efficacy and heregulin expression is still controversial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%