2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.10.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomized, double-blind, phase I clinical trial of fetal cell-based skin substitutes on healing of donor sites in burn patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Wound size and wound healing time were reported to be significantly reduced in treated patients. Another study demonstrated the efficacy of fetal fibroblast-based skin substitutes in patients with burn wounds [80].…”
Section: Clinical Advancement Of Skin Equivalents In Wound Healing Therapiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wound size and wound healing time were reported to be significantly reduced in treated patients. Another study demonstrated the efficacy of fetal fibroblast-based skin substitutes in patients with burn wounds [80].…”
Section: Clinical Advancement Of Skin Equivalents In Wound Healing Therapiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the advancement of culture techniques and ability to isolate dermal fibroblasts, clinical studies have evaluated the use of CDSs for the treatment of chronic skin ulcers (7 of 10 studies), surgical wounds and burns (Table 3 ) 55 , 60 68 . Important findings from these studies highlight the release of cytokines or growth factors, which activates many pathways for skin regeneration 60 , 63 .…”
Section: Human Adult Skin Cells In Tesssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cell Therapies for Cutaneous Regenerative Medicine Sub-optimal pharmacotherapeutic management of severe and complex cutaneous affections and complications (e.g., chronic ulcers, burns, donor-site wounds) has prompted the development of numerous skin graft solutions (e.g., amniotic membrane, cadaver grafts, fish skin), innovative bioengineered cellular therapy solutions (e.g., cultured autografts), or autologous and allogenic cell-based products (e.g., Allox R , Apligraf R , Epicel R , Lyphoderm R , OrCel R , ReCell R , TransCyte TM ) that complement surgical care and support tissue structural integrity and functional recovery (Lukish et al, 2001;Limat and Hunziker, 2002;Kumar et al, 2004;Amani et al, 2006;Hartmann et al, 2007;Zaulyanov and Kirsner, 2007;Akita et al, 2008;Hirt-Burri et al, 2008b;Guerid et al, 2013;Zuliani et al, 2013;Malhotra and Jain, 2014;Tan et al, 2014;Debels et al, 2015;Akershoek et al, 2016;Abdel-Sayed et al, 2019b;Lima-Junior et al, 2019;Momeni et al, 2019;Climov et al, 2020). Further optimization of biological starting materials for such advanced solutions may primarily benefit FIGURE 5 | Differential overview highlighting the similarities and differences between stem cells and primary FPC types.…”
Section: Swiss Multi-tiered Biobanking Model For Primary Fpcsmentioning
confidence: 99%