1992
DOI: 10.3109/09546639209088698
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomized, double-blind, comparative study of terbinafine vs griseofulvin in tinea capitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Randomized comparison studies of griseofulvin versus ketaconazole have shown ketaconazole to be less effective in treating tinea capitis (15, 16). Terbinafine has been reported to be as effective as griseofulvin, and a shorter duration of treatment is required with terbinafine (17, 18). To the best of our knowledge, itraconazole and fluconazole have not been directly compared with griseo‐fulvin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Randomized comparison studies of griseofulvin versus ketaconazole have shown ketaconazole to be less effective in treating tinea capitis (15, 16). Terbinafine has been reported to be as effective as griseofulvin, and a shorter duration of treatment is required with terbinafine (17, 18). To the best of our knowledge, itraconazole and fluconazole have not been directly compared with griseo‐fulvin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] As no case attributable to Microsporum species was treated, it is not possible to deduce how this infection would respond to 2 weeks of therapy with either drug. The results of our study suggest that both these drugs fulfil the above criteria equally well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] Based on their peculiar pharmacokinetic properties and previous data, it can be presumed that both these drugs will be effective when given as continuous therapy for 2 weeks. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] Based on their peculiar pharmacokinetic properties and previous data, it can be presumed that both these drugs will be effective when given as continuous therapy for 2 weeks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, all 9 non-responders had this dermatophyte, suggesti ng that the durati on of therapy has to be extended beyond 2 weeks in certain cases of T. rubrum infecti on. Although the number of cases resulti ng from other pathogens was small, they do respond to this short-term therapy with drug usually in Tenia capiti s. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] Bothitraconazole and terbinafi ne are highly lipophilic and kerati nophilic. They persist in the stratum corneum and hair in high concentrati ons for 3-4 weeks aft er therapy is disconti nued.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%