2016
DOI: 10.1097/dss.0000000000000805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Randomized, Comparative Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Two Injection Volumes of AbobotulinumtoxinA in Treatment of Glabellar Lines

Abstract: BACKGROUNDDifferent volumes of 0.9% NaCl may be used to reconstitute abobotulinumtoxinA yielding an injection volume that ranges from 0.05 to 0.1 mL per injection point for treatment of glabellar lines.OBJECTIVETo evaluate the efficacy, safety, and subject satisfaction of 2 different injection volumes to deliver the same unit dose of abobotulinumtoxinA for treatment of glabellar lines.MATERIALS AND METHODSThis randomized comparative study was conducted using 2 different reconstitution volumes to deliver a fixe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, a recent randomized, comparative study evaluating the efficacy and safety of injection volumes of 0.05 or 0.1 mL per injection point (to deliver 10 units of Azzalure) for the treatment of glabellar lines found no significant differences; both injection volumes resulted in comparable onset and duration of effect, frequency and severity of adverse events and similar patient satisfaction. 63 …”
Section: Myth 6: the Volume Of Injection Mattersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, a recent randomized, comparative study evaluating the efficacy and safety of injection volumes of 0.05 or 0.1 mL per injection point (to deliver 10 units of Azzalure) for the treatment of glabellar lines found no significant differences; both injection volumes resulted in comparable onset and duration of effect, frequency and severity of adverse events and similar patient satisfaction. 63 …”
Section: Myth 6: the Volume Of Injection Mattersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, also in the recent randomized comparative study of Punga et al, 13 a 2‐fold injection volume was shown to be effective and safe as well as the labeled injection volume.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…However, some studies have shown that a higher dilution remains effective and safe. 12,13 Since 2013, an innovative protocol has been developed in our clinic that works on a double dilution volume, identifies the injection site according to the specific anatomical-functional characteristics of each patient's musculature and applies a gentle massage to the area injected to optimize the spread of the toxin in the muscle. In this article, we want to describe our personal experience.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CMAP studies demonstrate the return of 20% of normal activity in patients as soon as seven days after BoNT injection in the EDB muscle [ 60 ]. Interestingly, in the glabellar muscles a substantial reduction in the CMAP parameter was still seen at six months after treatment, with values reduced to approximately 60% of the baseline amplitude in the labelled volume and to a numerically greater reduction of approximately 50% in the twofold volume group [ 61 ]. The reduction in CMAP was greater in the group who received the twofold injection volume at every time point, including time to the onset of effect and duration.…”
Section: Neurophysiological Measures Of Bont Effect In Facial Muscmentioning
confidence: 99%