2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11764-014-0417-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomised controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of a 6-month dietary and physical activity intervention for patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer

Abstract: This study shows that a pragmatic lifestyle intervention is feasible and can have a positive impact on health behaviours and other key outcomes in men with prostate cancer receiving ADT.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
89
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(58 reference statements)
1
89
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The pooled result for CRF was altered when omitting the study of Bourke et al 19 or O'Neill et al 23 Notably, more significantly improved results were obtained after omitting the study of Segal et al 25 On the other hand,…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The pooled result for CRF was altered when omitting the study of Bourke et al 19 or O'Neill et al 23 Notably, more significantly improved results were obtained after omitting the study of Segal et al 25 On the other hand,…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the nature of the interventions (self-report nature of subjective outcomes), most studies have high risk in the aspects of blinding of participants and intervention providers, except for two studies that were double-blinded. 21,23 There were two studies that referred to randomization, but no description was provided about how randomization was carried out, 11,20 while other studies used a computer-generated random digital packet. [18][19][23][24][25][26] Overall, the studies enrolled in this meta-analysis had moderate quality.…”
Section: Chinese Medical Sciences Journal March 2017mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aerobic exercise (55–80% APMHR) performed 2-3 times per week for 12-weeks, with healthy eating group based seminars every 2 weeks, has demonstrated clinically significant improvements in CRF and quality of life in sedentary men treated with ADT [19, 20]. In contrast individual nutrition advice to meet the United Kingdom Dietary guidelines [30] with 30 min per day of brisk walking for 24 weeks demonstrated no significant changes in CRF or quality of life compared to usual care [31]. Thus it appears CRF may be better managed with structured exercise prescription and concurrent healthy eating.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature to date has encompassed general healthy eating guidelines for the management of prostate cancer treated related side effects [19, 20, 31], however general guidelines do not take into account the specific dietary requirements needed to manage the ADT-related side effects. Therefore, the role of specific individualized nutrition therapy tailored to alleviate the side effects of ADT, particularly CRF, and improve quality of life warrants investigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fatigue measurements, assessed by patient-reported questionnaires, such as the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue (FACT-F)34 or the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue,35 are frequently assessed together with exercise outcomes in these studies 24,36,37. In general, the evidence is equivocal as to whether exercise helps diminish patient-reported fatigue.…”
Section: Impact Of Exercise On Patients With Prostate Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%