2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11217-008-9107-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A (R)evaluation of Nietzsche’s Anti-democratic Pedagogy: The Overman, Perspectivism, and Self-overcoming

Abstract: In this paper, I argue that Friedrich Nietzsche's concept of self-overcoming has been largely misinterpreted in the philosophy of education journals. The misinterpretation partially stems from a misconstruction of Nietzsche's perspectivism, and leads to a conception of self-overcoming that is inconsistent with Nietzsche's educational ideals. To show this, I examine some of the prominent features of the so-called ''debate'' of the 1980s surrounding Nietzsche's conception of self-overcoming. I then offer an alte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Aquilo que se denomina por self-mastery proporcionaria que nossa energia fosse canalizada para atividades afirmativas da vida (JONAS, 2009).…”
Section: Relacionando a Tomada De Decisão Ao Tempo Nietzschiano: Uma unclassified
“…Aquilo que se denomina por self-mastery proporcionaria que nossa energia fosse canalizada para atividades afirmativas da vida (JONAS, 2009).…”
Section: Relacionando a Tomada De Decisão Ao Tempo Nietzschiano: Uma unclassified
“…2 Other deployments have adopted Nietzsche to the cause of democratic education, or a version of it, that incorporates some kind of quest for higher culture. 3 So, for example, over a series of papers, Jonas (2009; has sought to rehabilitate Nietzsche and make him useful to present-day democratic societies, most recently by arguing that in Schopenhauer as Educator Nietzsche develops a vision of human excellence and flourishing which balances the needs of the many with the cultivation of individual greatness. This vision could be applied with modification to present-day democratic societies, Jonas argues, that would better serve collective wellbeing if they expended more effort generating the conditions necessary to support the cultivation of great educators, who have achieved a level of intellectual and spiritual harmony that will allow them to serve as exemplars for the rest of us, raising us up by the force of their example.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While most interpreters consider Nietzsche to be useful for philosophical reflection on contemporary educational concerns-e.g. Bingham (2001;, Fennell (2005), Fitzsimons (2007, Gregory (2001), Irwin (2003), Jonas (2009Jonas ( , 2010Jonas ( , 2012Jonas ( , 2013aJonas ( , 2013b, Jonas & Nakazawa (2008), Jonas & Yacek (2018), Joosten (2015), Marshall (2001), Mintz (2004), Ramaekers (2001), Sassone (2004), Steel (2014), Stolz (2017), Tubbs (2005), Yacek (2014aYacek ( , 2014b-others have argued that Nietzsche's philosophical legacy is incompatible with the aims and practices of democratic education-e.g. Allen (2017), Aviram (1991), Jenkins (1982), Johnston (2001), Rosenow (1973Rosenow ( , 1989.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%