2019 IEEE 27th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/re.2019.00041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Query System for Extracting Requirements-Related Information from Legal Texts

Abstract: Searching legal texts for relevant information is a complex and expensive activity. The search solutions offered by present-day legal portals are targeted primarily at legal professionals. These solutions are not adequate for requirements analysts whose objective is to extract domain knowledge including stakeholders, rights and duties, and business processes that are relevant to legal requirements. Semantic Web technologies now enable smart search capabilities and can be exploited to help requirements analysts… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another direction is to analyze the usefulness and relevance of these semantic legal metadata in a practical use case, such as a query system to answer the questions that a requirements analyst could ask when elaborating legal requirements. We have already started investigating this direction in (Sleimi et al, 2019), but further work remains, e.g., semantic integration with cross-reference resolution (Sannier et al, 2017), and identifying the true subject of a given legal statement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another direction is to analyze the usefulness and relevance of these semantic legal metadata in a practical use case, such as a query system to answer the questions that a requirements analyst could ask when elaborating legal requirements. We have already started investigating this direction in (Sleimi et al, 2019), but further work remains, e.g., semantic integration with cross-reference resolution (Sannier et al, 2017), and identifying the true subject of a given legal statement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The refinement of the SQs and the indications of the three expert authors allowed the identification of the following works to ensure that main approaches to formalize specification languages for contracts were included [7,39,53,72,99], legal ontologies [6,48,54], and reviews [27,77]. Concerning the proceedings of recent conferences, the works in [2,5,40,80,82,87,89,90] have been included. The outcome of applying SQs for all six RQs and the refinement process led to the identification of a total of 447 publications.…”
Section: Search and Screening Of Selected Papersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further tasks in legal NLP are also of recent research interest [128], including legal case retrieval, legal case entailment, judicial prediction. Sleimi et al [689] used NLP to query legal requirements and support the legal requirement handling.…”
Section: Nlp Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%