Queer Attachments 2017
DOI: 10.4324/9781315245478-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Queer Undertaking: Uncanny Attachments in the HBO Television Drama Series Six Feet Under

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Flanders is a television context wherein the mere presence of non-heterosexual and/or non-cisgendered characters – regardless of their prominence in the text – does not offer differentiation between texts. Contrary to the United States, where the relation between the televisibility of LGBTQ+ identities and distinction is largely affirmative and situated at the level of consumption (see Becker, 2006; Chambers, 2009; Munt, 2006; Walters, 2003), Flemish prestige television fiction presents an inverse image. The series discussed in this essay relate to their socially liberal audiences not by affirming their tastes and socio-cultural dispositions, but by textually delegitimizing those of the demographics they distinguish themselves from.…”
Section: Distinctive Queernessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Flanders is a television context wherein the mere presence of non-heterosexual and/or non-cisgendered characters – regardless of their prominence in the text – does not offer differentiation between texts. Contrary to the United States, where the relation between the televisibility of LGBTQ+ identities and distinction is largely affirmative and situated at the level of consumption (see Becker, 2006; Chambers, 2009; Munt, 2006; Walters, 2003), Flemish prestige television fiction presents an inverse image. The series discussed in this essay relate to their socially liberal audiences not by affirming their tastes and socio-cultural dispositions, but by textually delegitimizing those of the demographics they distinguish themselves from.…”
Section: Distinctive Queernessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, producers’ discourses on Flemish prestige television fiction naturalize the envisioned socio-cultural deficit in mainstream Flanders by claiming to emphasize ‘authenticity, recognition and Flemishness’ (Dhoest, 2015: 15). By pointing to the deficiencies of what is commonly understood as ‘ordinary Flemishness’ and portraying LGBTQ+ characters as morally superior, the series discussed in this article could also be understood as deconstructions of the normal, a core point in queer television studies (see Chambers, 2009; Joyrich, 2014; Munt, 2006). In their engagement with sexual and gender diversity, however, texts employing distinctive queers reduce LGBTQ+ identities to their sexual or gendered difference, and transform LGBTQ+ inclusivity from an ethical disposition to a matter of taste and legitimate socio-cultural sensibilities.…”
Section: Distinctive Queernessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not to say, of course, that static normality is never disavowed through popular television fiction. Premium cable series, such as those under the HBO or Showtime banners, for example, are often cited in queer television studies scholarship as examples of pop-cultural products with a decidedly more subversive and nuanced approach to gender and sexuality (e.g., Chambers 2003Chambers , 2009Dhaenens and Van Bauwel 2012;Munt 2006). Genres such as fantasy and science fiction with a fraught relationship to the mainstream, often with a certain cult sensibility to them, are constructed as another site of queerly antinormative articulations.…”
Section: Television Fiction and Normality/normativitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dow 2001; Avila-Saavedra 2009; Kies 2016) or, conversely, subvert heteronormality by queering established representational strategies (e.g. Munt 2006;Dhaenens & Van Bauwel 2012). This is not to say that queer television analyses adopt exclusively textual perspectives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%