2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A quantitative risk assessment model for evaluating hazmat transportation accident risk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to a review of hazmat risk assessment literature between 1991 and 2020, many current risk assessment models are based on various simplifying assumptions, which leads to high uncertainty in the results. 35 These limitations/simplifying assumptions in reported literature include (i) applying a common national frequency uniformly on all road segments 29,30 or assuming that the frequency is uniform over entire administrative districts, 36 (ii) not using historical accident data and incident probabilities, 37,29 which are indispensable for a practicable QRA, and (iii) considering only population densities along the route for calculating the number of fatalities, which does not take into account the occupants of vehicles on the road who are more susceptible in the event of an accident. 36,37 All of these imply that the accuracy and practicability of risk assessment models must be improved further.…”
Section: Used Bowtie Analysis In a Bayesianmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to a review of hazmat risk assessment literature between 1991 and 2020, many current risk assessment models are based on various simplifying assumptions, which leads to high uncertainty in the results. 35 These limitations/simplifying assumptions in reported literature include (i) applying a common national frequency uniformly on all road segments 29,30 or assuming that the frequency is uniform over entire administrative districts, 36 (ii) not using historical accident data and incident probabilities, 37,29 which are indispensable for a practicable QRA, and (iii) considering only population densities along the route for calculating the number of fatalities, which does not take into account the occupants of vehicles on the road who are more susceptible in the event of an accident. 36,37 All of these imply that the accuracy and practicability of risk assessment models must be improved further.…”
Section: Used Bowtie Analysis In a Bayesianmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 These limitations/simplifying assumptions in reported literature include (i) applying a common national frequency uniformly on all road segments 29,30 or assuming that the frequency is uniform over entire administrative districts, 36 (ii) not using historical accident data and incident probabilities, 37,29 which are indispensable for a practicable QRA, and (iii) considering only population densities along the route for calculating the number of fatalities, which does not take into account the occupants of vehicles on the road who are more susceptible in the event of an accident. 36,37 All of these imply that the accuracy and practicability of risk assessment models must be improved further. Furthermore, it is necessary to incorporate the risk amplification or mitigation contribution of road characteristics and traffic conditions.…”
Section: Used Bowtie Analysis In a Bayesianmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Have introduced Bayesian network (BN) to predict the accident of handling time to enhance the performance of emergency rescue in transportation accidents of hazardous materials. Weng et al [8] developed a quantitative risk assessment for the hazmat transportation accident in which the possible accident scenarios are identified by an event tree with help of six intermediate events. Ghaleh et al [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Chakrabarti and Parikh have proposed a risk-based approach to the HazMat transportation route evaluation by considering the probability of the collision accident and its consequences. 16 A more advanced quantitative risk assessment model was developed by Weng et al 14 for evaluating HazMat transportation accident risk. Zhong et al have investigated the vulnerability of the HazMat highway transportation network by quantifying the Impact Strength of each link in the entire network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They may vary from human errors to severe weather conditions . Various approaches have been applied to the risk assessment of HazMat transportation, which includes conventional statistical methods, the F–N curve, the event tree, and the Bayesian network . Chakrabarti and Parikh have proposed a risk-based approach to the HazMat transportation route evaluation by considering the probability of the collision accident and its consequences .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%