1980
DOI: 10.1016/s0040-4039(01)85582-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A quantitative approach to optical resolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We prefer the use of Fogassy S-factors (2 yield de) to express the overall efficiencies. [7] Scanning of 2 a/2 c ratios revealed that the optimal concentration for nucleation inhibition was 6 mol % of 2 c (see Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We prefer the use of Fogassy S-factors (2 yield de) to express the overall efficiencies. [7] Scanning of 2 a/2 c ratios revealed that the optimal concentration for nucleation inhibition was 6 mol % of 2 c (see Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore it is advisable to use the parameter F characterizing the efficiency of the procedure (F=ee*Y). 18 This factor is actually the yield of enantiomeric excess separated. (Earlier this factor was marked with the letter S, but it could refer to the configuration even if it was marked by a different font.…”
Section: Nhchomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no regular tendency in the change of yields during resolutions of 1 and a small increase in the yield could be observed during the resolutions of 2. Comparison of the resolution efficiencies (S) 5 of the 144 hours resolutions and those of repeated resolutions (last lines in Table 1 and 2, respectively) shows that long crystallization times resulted in higher efficiencies in both cases. Prolonged crystallization time is also advantageous from a practical point of view since repeated salt and mother liquor workup procedures can be avoided.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%