2006
DOI: 10.1074/mcp.m500414-mcp200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Quantitative Analysis of Arabidopsis Plasma Membrane Using Trypsin-catalyzed 18O Labeling

Abstract: Typical mass spectrometry-based protein lists from purified fractions are confounded by the absence of tools for evaluating contaminants. In this report, we compare the results of a standard survey experiment using an ion trap mass spectrometer with those obtained using dual isotope labeling and a Q-TOF mass spectrometer to quantify the degree of enrichment of proteins in purified subcellular fractions of Arabidopsis plasma membrane. Incorporation of a stable isotope, either H 2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
83
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
3
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…58 Table 5 shows that either six or seven LRR RLKs were identified by our methanol approach using the total microsomal fraction (depending on the origin of a peptide with an exact sequence match to two LRR RLKs), whereas only two LRR RLKs were found by the Brij-58 method. At3g02880 was identified by both methods and was also found in four other proteomic analyses of the Arabidopsis plasma membrane, [25][26][27][28] suggesting it is either an abundant LRR RLK or an easily solubilized membrane protein. At3g28450 and At4g08850 were also identified in three of these proteomic studies (with the exception of Marmagne et al 25 ), whereas both At1g06840 and At5g16590 were identified by Nelson et al 28 and At5g16590 was detected by Nuhse et al 26 Our methods uniquely identified At1g62950, At5g25930, and possibly At1g35710.…”
Section: Mitra Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…58 Table 5 shows that either six or seven LRR RLKs were identified by our methanol approach using the total microsomal fraction (depending on the origin of a peptide with an exact sequence match to two LRR RLKs), whereas only two LRR RLKs were found by the Brij-58 method. At3g02880 was identified by both methods and was also found in four other proteomic analyses of the Arabidopsis plasma membrane, [25][26][27][28] suggesting it is either an abundant LRR RLK or an easily solubilized membrane protein. At3g28450 and At4g08850 were also identified in three of these proteomic studies (with the exception of Marmagne et al 25 ), whereas both At1g06840 and At5g16590 were identified by Nelson et al 28 and At5g16590 was detected by Nuhse et al 26 Our methods uniquely identified At1g62950, At5g25930, and possibly At1g35710.…”
Section: Mitra Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At3g02880 was identified by both methods and was also found in four other proteomic analyses of the Arabidopsis plasma membrane, [25][26][27][28] suggesting it is either an abundant LRR RLK or an easily solubilized membrane protein. At3g28450 and At4g08850 were also identified in three of these proteomic studies (with the exception of Marmagne et al 25 ), whereas both At1g06840 and At5g16590 were identified by Nelson et al 28 and At5g16590 was detected by Nuhse et al 26 Our methods uniquely identified At1g62950, At5g25930, and possibly At1g35710. It has been reported that a number of these identified LRR RLKs reside in lipid rafts and are enriched in Triton X-100 insoluble plasma membrane microdomains.…”
Section: Mitra Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Proteins significantly enriched in DRMs after flg22 treatment are indicated in bold (p Ͻ 0.05). Functional category (FC); Arabidopsis Genome Initiative code (AGI code); average fold-change (av fold); number of TM domains based on the consensus predicted by ARAMEMNON (TM, (17)); experimental evidence for PM association (PM, (17)(18)(19)(20)); transcriptionally co-expressed with FLS2 (46), number indicates rank of co-expressed gene according to ATTED (ATTED); elevated transcript levels in response to flg22 treatment (flg22 up, (14,21)); phosphorylated after flg22 treatment (P flg22, (15,22)); (putative) mutants of according genes were analyzed for flg22 responsiveness in this study (MA); flg22-induced ROS (ROS). enriched (enr.…”
Section: Table 1 Responding Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%