2012
DOI: 10.1080/00045608.2011.627054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Quantile Regression Approach to Areal Interpolation

Abstract: Areal interpolation has been developed to provide attribute estimates whenever data compilation or an analysis requires a change in the measurement support. Over time numerous approaches have been proposed to solve the problem of areal interpolation. Quantile regression is used in this study as the basis of the areal interpolator because it provides estimates conditioned on local parameters rather than global ones. An empirical case study is provided using a data set in northern New England. Land cover data, p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these studies neglect the rather arbitrary nature of administrative boundaries, which are unlikely to delineate areas with homogeneous population distribution characteristics. Therefore, local regression approaches that estimate separate coefficients for each population record have been tested through (i) quantile regression (Cromley, Hanink, & Bentley, 2012) and (ii) geographically weighted regression (Dong et al, 2010;Lin, Cromley, & Zhang, 2011;Lo, 2008). While the application of these techniques showed an improvement upon the global regression approach, it still did not seem to solve the classic problem at the population distribution's extremes though.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these studies neglect the rather arbitrary nature of administrative boundaries, which are unlikely to delineate areas with homogeneous population distribution characteristics. Therefore, local regression approaches that estimate separate coefficients for each population record have been tested through (i) quantile regression (Cromley, Hanink, & Bentley, 2012) and (ii) geographically weighted regression (Dong et al, 2010;Lin, Cromley, & Zhang, 2011;Lo, 2008). While the application of these techniques showed an improvement upon the global regression approach, it still did not seem to solve the classic problem at the population distribution's extremes though.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also pointed out that choices of bandwidths and scales of target zones have a significant impact on the performances of GWR-based AI models, while the locations of estimation points did not matter as much as the former two factors. Cromley et al (2012) have also used quantile regression (Koenker & Bassett, 1978) as the basis for estimating the density surface for ancillary classes. By associating every observation (source zone) with a quantile level, density values for each ancillary class within the observation can be estimated.…”
Section: Statistically-based Polycategorical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local models, in which the relationship between an attribute variable and ancillary information is estimated using a selected subset of observations from the full set, are now fairly common in AI procedures as they address the heterogeneity problem with respect to any relationship. By close scrutiny of two statistical interpolators that emphasize local variation, a geographically weighted regression (GWR)-based (Lin, Cromley, & Zhang, 2011) and a quantile regression (QR)-based interpolator (Cromley, Hanink, & Bentley, 2012), this study proposes a new local polycategorical AI procedure that integrates the positive aspects of both aforementioned regressions. QR is a regression with varying parameter estimates like GWR, but these regression models differ in two respects: (1) QR minimizes the sum of absolute deviations whereas GWR minimizes the sum of squared deviations, and (2) QR estimates are a function of a position in the statistical distribution (the quantile level) rather than a position in geographic space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third category includes intelligent methods that integrate land cover data in the population estimation, ranging from a simple binary dasymetric method (Fisher & Langford, 1996;Flowerdew & Green, 1989;Holt, Lo, & Hodler, 2004) to more sophisticated procedures such as those that are logical extensions of Wright's (1936) original dasymetric mapping (see Eicher & Brewer, 2001;Langford, 2006;Mennis, 2003;Mennis & Hultgren, 2006;Reibel & Agrawal, 2007) and various forms of statistical analysis (Cromley, Hanink, & Bentley, 2012;Langford, Maguire, & Unwin, 1991;Lin, Cromley, & Zhang, 2011;Lo, 2008;Schroeder and Van Riper, 2013;Yuan, Smith, & Limp, 1997). An alternative approach in this category did not use the land cover categories as the correlate but instead integrated an impervious surface fraction derived from Thematic Mapper (TM) imagery into a cokriging method to interpolate population density using the spatial correlation and crosscorrelation between population and this fraction (Wu & Murray, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%