2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incorporating spatial non-stationarity to improve dasymetric mapping of population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At high population density, an underestimation of the original census data was observed, whereas significant overestimation was observed at extremely low population density, especially for WorldPop. These types of errors were also observed in previous dasymetric modeling studies [44][45][46]. However, POI-EAHSI showed significantly higher accuracy than WorldPop in both tails of population density, especially for the low tail (R 2 = 0.57 vs. R 2 = 0.15).…”
Section: Accuracy Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…At high population density, an underestimation of the original census data was observed, whereas significant overestimation was observed at extremely low population density, especially for WorldPop. These types of errors were also observed in previous dasymetric modeling studies [44][45][46]. However, POI-EAHSI showed significantly higher accuracy than WorldPop in both tails of population density, especially for the low tail (R 2 = 0.57 vs. R 2 = 0.15).…”
Section: Accuracy Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…GWR is a local spatial statistical method for evaluating how the relationships between a dependent variable and one or more explanatory variables change spatially. As one of the useful tools to explore the spatial local heterogeneity, GWR has been widely used in many fields in recent years, For example, the geographic variation and impact factors of urban public green space availability [46], peri-urban agriculture [47], noise pollution [48], population [49] and resident recreation demand [50] have been investigated with GWR. The GWR method was usually compared with global spatial statistical methods, such as the ordinary least squares (OLS) regression, regression kriging, or co-kriging and the comparisons showed the advantages of GWR in improving mapping quality and exploring spatially varying local relationships [47][48][49][50][51].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The global regression assumes that the relationships between the variables are homogeneous across space. However, spatial dependences often are not homogeneous across large geographical regions [55]. We were more concerned about areas where spatial redistribution is sensitive to climate change.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%