1994
DOI: 10.1080/00207549408957008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A quantification of the economic value of flexible capacity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various flexibility elements have been proposed in the manufacturing flexibility literature such as machine flexibility, material handling flexibility, process flexibility, routing flexibility, etc. Various research methodologies have been used including empirical investigation [1,[4][5][6], development of mathematical models [7][8][9][10], development of simulation models [11,12], development of theoretical framework [13] and literature survey [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various flexibility elements have been proposed in the manufacturing flexibility literature such as machine flexibility, material handling flexibility, process flexibility, routing flexibility, etc. Various research methodologies have been used including empirical investigation [1,[4][5][6], development of mathematical models [7][8][9][10], development of simulation models [11,12], development of theoretical framework [13] and literature survey [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laengle, et al (1994), however, have proposed a 47 theoretical model to determine the optimal capacity level for a combination of dedicated and flexible manufacturing systems using varied and realistic assumptions. Because large apparel manufacturers today have both dedicated and flexible plants, this model is worth exploring.…”
Section: Options Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the firm can seek more diversity in its environment (e.g., more variability in its product line or more customers) because it has established more flexible technologies (deGroote, 1994 shifts, and longer use of equipment over generations of product changes (Laengle, Griffen, & Griffen, 1994). (March, 1991).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%