2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.08.082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A quantification of immersion of the adsorbed ionic surfactants at liquid|fluid interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Phan et al followed this approach and developed a model for non-ionic surfactants such as MIBC [132] and 1-hexanol [133], but they used an ionizing electrode to measure the surface potential. Surface excess, derived from the Gibbs isotherm, is also widely used to fit the adsorption models [134,135], but we did not find any paper using surface excess from neutron reflection or radiotracer results to fit adsorption models.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscript 50mentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Phan et al followed this approach and developed a model for non-ionic surfactants such as MIBC [132] and 1-hexanol [133], but they used an ionizing electrode to measure the surface potential. Surface excess, derived from the Gibbs isotherm, is also widely used to fit the adsorption models [134,135], but we did not find any paper using surface excess from neutron reflection or radiotracer results to fit adsorption models.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscript 50mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Therefore, the discrepancies can only be explained by more realistic adsorption models, considering the density profile of surfactants and counterions. However, very few models [134,135] have considered this property of adsorbed surfactant layers.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscript 50mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[33] Shahir et al argue that at the oil/water interface,t he surfactant presence is 70 %l ower than that at the water/air interface,asaconsequence of stronger repulsion between the ionic SDS head groups at the oil/water interface. [34] Similarly, Fainerman et al emphasized that the competitive as well as cooperative adsorption between oil and surfactant molecules should be taken into account to provide agood description of the oil/water interface. [35] During the surfactant-induced ordering of MCT molecules,w ea ssume ac hange in area per MCT molecule from 150 2 (low ordered) to % 80 2 (fully ordered).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this model, ionic surfactant SDS has a primary adsorption layer at the air−water interface and a secondary adsorption layer underneath the interface that is immersed in the water phase. 20 This model extends the twolayer model in Table 1 to four layers, including counterion adsorption layers for each surfactant adsorption layer. Briefly, the additional layer facilitates the adsorption of both surfactant and counterions and consequently reduces the surface tension more effectively.…”
Section: Comparison With Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 98%