The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2010
DOI: 10.1108/1759751x201100019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A qualitative study of the relationship of personality type with career management and career choice preference in a group of bioscience postgraduate students and postdoctoral researchers

Abstract: This study reports on the career management and career choice preferences of a sample of bioscience postgraduate students and postdoctoral researchers according to their personality type as determined using the Myers Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI). Correlations can be found but other decision-making processes come into play and are more influential regarding career choices.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study only explores individual-level influences on career management competencies and does not extend to social/cultural capital explanations. Many, for example, acknowledge the influence of social class (Greenbank 2011), ethnicity (Kuijpers and Meijers 2012) and media, social and political climate (Blackford 2010). We gathered self-report data, which is considered problematic by some (Douglass, Thomson, and Zhao 2012), using a single method that may raise concerns for common method variance (Taylor 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study only explores individual-level influences on career management competencies and does not extend to social/cultural capital explanations. Many, for example, acknowledge the influence of social class (Greenbank 2011), ethnicity (Kuijpers and Meijers 2012) and media, social and political climate (Blackford 2010). We gathered self-report data, which is considered problematic by some (Douglass, Thomson, and Zhao 2012), using a single method that may raise concerns for common method variance (Taylor 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theme 2: establishing, maintaining and managing relationships As discussed in Theme 1, fellows viewed the freedom gained through fellowship as a key to establishing themselves as independent academics. During the interviews, it was clear that networks and relationships played crucial roles in creating independence during this establishment phase (Åkerlind, 2005;Bäker, 2015;Blackford, 2010;Downs and Morrison, 2011). While a significant part of each interview focussed on how these networks and partnerships supported the fellows' progression towards independence, it quickly became apparent that the status and agency of each fellow within a particular community could create challenges, primarily in the way they were seen or recognised by other staff in the department (Araújo, 2009;Hall, 2017;Laudel and Gläser, 2008;Mackie and McArthur, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eight studies in our database explored skills development and career prospects in PDRF. This group of studies investigated career satisfaction of PDRFs in relation to their future expectations (Van der Weijden et al 2016), influence of personality on career management style and preference (Blackford 2010), effects of PDRF mobility on academic performance (Zubieta 2009), usefulness of PDRF in preparation for specialisation in mental health (Stacy, Klee, and Jansen 2018). Another study, through mixed method, summarises research and professional activities for onsite PDRFs in small business enterprises (Renner and Ayers 2014).…”
Section: Development Of Skills and Career Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%