A qualitative analysis of vertical leadership development amongst NHS health-care workers in low to middle income country settings

Abstract

Purpose The improving global health (IGH) programme is a leadership development programme that aims to develop leadership skills and behaviours alongside quality improvement methodology in National Health Service (NHS) employees in a global health setting. Through collaboration, experiential learning and mentorship, the programme aims to produce both vertical and horizontal leadership development in its participants. This paper aims to describe the programme and its impact, in terms of leadership development, in a sample of participants. Design/methodology/approach Open coding and thematic analysis of leadership development summaries (LDS) completed by 39 returned IGH participants were conducted. LDS are written on completion of the overseas placement; participants reflect on their personal leadership development against the nine dimensions of the NHS Healthcare Leadership Model (2013). Findings These IGH programme participants have reported a change in the way they think, behave and see the world. A development in sense of self and experience in developing team members are the two most commonly reported themes. Adaptability, communication, overcoming boundaries, collaborative working, “big picture” thinking and strategic thinking were also identified. Research limitations/implications The study is limited by the relatively low number of completed LDS. More work is needed to understand the long-term effect of this type of leadership development on the NHS. Other leadership development programmes should consider focussing on vertical and horizontal leadership development. Originality/value This more granular understanding of the leadership skills and behaviours developed and how it is the programme’s design that creates it, has not previously been described.

Understanding rebel nurse leadership‐as‐practice: Challenging and changing the status quo in hospitals

“…In our view, this conflict is connected to rebel nurse leadership practices, because nurses experience internal conflicts that stimulate rebel leadership behavior. In contrast, research has also shown that discussing conflicting perspectives supports collaboration and the building of collective leadership in complex practices (Follet, 2011; Streeton et al, 2021; Uhl‐Bien et al, 2020; Verhoeven et al, 2022). We noticed that speaking up and discussing conflicting perspectives and dilemmas in daily practice helped nurses and nurse managers find a collaborative perspective.…”

Knowing, relating and the absence of conflict: relational leadership processes between hospital boards and chairs of nurse councils

“…Conflict is an element of collaboration (Follett,1926/1942; Godwyn, 2022) and of collective leadership processes (Denis et al , 2012). While conflict is mostly seen as a destructive process (Edmondson and Smith McLain, 2006), it can also be a potential force for collaborating (Streeton et al , 2021) and structuring. Although, in the interviews, participants were explicit on their judgement of the acts of the other in the observed interactions, these judgements remained unsaid (Engbers, 2020).…”

The power of coaching: Developing leaders and beyond

“…This approach aligns with horizontal leadership development, that is, introducing new concepts and developing "hard skills," functional and technical competencies that lead to lateral growth within their current framework and perspectives, and is an important component of professional and leadership development. 26,27 In contrast, coaching, at its core, offers a different model based on partnership, treating the client as capable and creative, and supportively empowering the client to find their own solution. Additionally, coaching can be the catalyst of changes beyond the acquisition of knowledge and expertise leading to a more fundamental shift in how the coachee thinks, by raising consciousness, challenging existing mental models and world views, exploring new approaches and perspectives, and engaging with diverse points of view.…”

“…In turn, this results in new ways of thinking and establishing new frameworks and perspectives. 26,27 Pairing coaching with traditional leadership development programs can be particularly effective because they each leverage non-traditional developmental modalities. For example, coaching enhances leadership development by supporting goal setting, problem-solving, and change management, and facilitates relationship building and reflection which cultivates long-term development.…”

“…This method works well for programs whose goal is to develop theoretical knowledge, advance expertise, and teach factual content. This approach aligns with horizontal leadership development, that is, introducing new concepts and developing “hard skills,” functional and technical competencies that lead to lateral growth within their current framework and perspectives, and is an important component of professional and leadership development 26,27 …”