2011
DOI: 10.7322/abcs.v36i2.63
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A qualidade das informações sobre doenças disponíveis em websites brasileiros: uma revisão

Abstract: Este estudo, por meio de uma revisão da literatura, teve o propósito de alertar para a possibilidade de obtenção de informações incorretas veiculadas na internet sobre doenças. Durante a revisão, buscou-se por trabalhos que avaliaram a qualidade das informações sobre doenças divulgadas por websites do Brasil. A consulta dos artigos deu-se por meio dos bancos de dados LILACS – BIREME, MEDLINE, SciELO e PubMed, sendo que o recorte temporal foi de 2000 a 2009. Verificou-se que poucos foram os estudos que avaliara… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
5
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies show that Internet users resort to search tools, such as Google, to search for relevant subjects and usually do not explore different pages of results, preferring to repeat the search if they do not find what they want in the first page 10,29 . Our results confirm international literature because it was possible to observe that Internet is an important source of information about health, even about pain-related contents, and is a tool being increasingly used by people, being possible to observe in different searched pages a high number of user accesses and interactions 3,4,5,7,10,21,30 . We decided in this study to use the documental research modality, because this is recommended when researchers aim at capturing information directly from the source, without their intervention.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies show that Internet users resort to search tools, such as Google, to search for relevant subjects and usually do not explore different pages of results, preferring to repeat the search if they do not find what they want in the first page 10,29 . Our results confirm international literature because it was possible to observe that Internet is an important source of information about health, even about pain-related contents, and is a tool being increasingly used by people, being possible to observe in different searched pages a high number of user accesses and interactions 3,4,5,7,10,21,30 . We decided in this study to use the documental research modality, because this is recommended when researchers aim at capturing information directly from the source, without their intervention.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Internet is already widely used, both in computers and cell phones, with incredible growth 1 and is used as research site (e.g., to look for scientific references), research object (being what is being studied), and research tool (data col-lection tool) 2 . So, the worldwide web is a tool to promote health and, as a consequence, to empower individuals, that is, a partner in their search for better understanding what they feel and sharing knowledge [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] . Health promotion is the process of qualifying the community in order to reach physical, mental and social wellbeing 11 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As far as author identification is concerned, it is essential that any information should indicate the person responsible; regardless of the medium in which it is published 5 . This allows the public to verify that the content designer is properly qualified in the subject area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, analysis of the quality of the disseminated information still presents limitations. 3,4,5 The instruments made for this purpose are scarce; those available are presented exclusively in English and need re-assessments and re-adaptations, since technological changes have impacts on changes in the web environment itself 5,6 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation