2005
DOI: 10.1126/science.1109555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Pulsar Bonanza

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
92
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
92
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This clearly contradicts the earlier statement of Malofeev et al (1996), which estimated the transition frequency to be around 3 GHz. This value is also higher than the transition frequency one can infer from Lorimer & Kramer (2005) -namely from their Fig. 4.3, which suggests that for a pulsar with DM = 27 pc/cm 3 ν c should be close to 4 GHz.…”
Section: General Picturementioning
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This clearly contradicts the earlier statement of Malofeev et al (1996), which estimated the transition frequency to be around 3 GHz. This value is also higher than the transition frequency one can infer from Lorimer & Kramer (2005) -namely from their Fig. 4.3, which suggests that for a pulsar with DM = 27 pc/cm 3 ν c should be close to 4 GHz.…”
Section: General Picturementioning
confidence: 65%
“…This came from the observational experience with this pulsar and strong flux variability observed at 5 GHz, when we observed it for the purpose of estimating its spectrum (Maron et al 2000). The theory (see Lorimer & Kramer 2005, for summary) predicts that at 4.8 GHz a pulsar with DM = 26.8 pc cm −3 should be close to its transition frequency, but on the strong scintillation side as well.…”
Section: Individual Session Flux Density Variationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The peak flux of the giant pulses were computed using the modified radiometer equation (Lorimer & Kramer 2005) for the pulsar case, S peak = (S /N) · S min . With the above considerations of the nebular contribution to T total and with T sys = 30 K in the WSRT's L-Band, the system retained sufficiently high sensitivity in the first 15 000 s of the observation.…”
Section: Flux Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%