2011
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201116850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffractive and refractive timescales at 4.8 GHz in PSR B0329+54

Abstract: Aims. We present the results of flux density monitoring of PSR B0329+54 at the frequency of 4.8 GHz using the 32-m TCfA radiotelescope. The observations were conducted between 2002 and 2005. The main goal of the project was to find interstellar scintillation (ISS) parameters for the pulsar at the frequency at which it was never studied in detail. To achieve this, the 20 observing sessions consisted of 3-min integrations, which on average lasted 24 h. This gave us sufficient sensitivity to all types of flux den… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A factor that needs to be checked is whether refractive and diffractive interstellar scintillation may affect the flux and spectral estimates. It is known that refractive scintillation (Gupta et al 1994) has a timescale of the order of days and diffractive scintillation (Lewandowski et al 2011) can be of the order of minutes. RSL+16 has excluded the effect of both kinds of scintillation on their flux estimates by comparing with the scintillation timescales with the total integration time.…”
Section: Spectral Difference Between the Two Modesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A factor that needs to be checked is whether refractive and diffractive interstellar scintillation may affect the flux and spectral estimates. It is known that refractive scintillation (Gupta et al 1994) has a timescale of the order of days and diffractive scintillation (Lewandowski et al 2011) can be of the order of minutes. RSL+16 has excluded the effect of both kinds of scintillation on their flux estimates by comparing with the scintillation timescales with the total integration time.…”
Section: Spectral Difference Between the Two Modesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To create the new version of the plot in addition to the data used by L04 and all the references therein (see the figure caption for a full reference list) we used our data presented in Paper 1 (these are shown as open red circles) and the results of our current research (full blue circles). We also added two α estimations from our scintillation studies of PSR B0329+54 (α = 3.86 ± 0.24, Lewandowski et al 2011) and PSR B0823+26 (α = 3.94 ± 0.36, Daszuta, Lewandowski & Kijak 2013); these are shown in Figure 2 by diamonds. The current version of the α versus DM plot looks significantly different from the one showed by L04, and not only because we increased the number of measurements (by the factor of 2.25).…”
Section: The Frequency Evolution Of Pulse Broadeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This behaviour is clearly due to the strong interstellar scintillation and makes flux measurements of this source uncertain. According to the work of Lewandowski et al (2011), the pulsar B0329+54 has a transition frequency between 8 and 10 GHz, which suggests that it may have undergone occasional …”
Section: Scintillation and Modulation Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%