2013
DOI: 10.1037/a0030747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A psychophysiological investigation of threat and reward sensitivity in individuals with panic disorder and/or major depressive disorder.

Abstract: Heightened sensitivity to threat and reduced sensitivity to reward are potential mechanisms of dysfunction in anxiety and depressive disorders, respectively. However, few studies have simultaneously examined whether these mechanisms are unique or common to these disorders. In this study, sensitivity to predictable and unpredictable threat (measured by startle response during threat anticipation) and sensitivity to reward (measured by frontal electroencephalographic [EEG] asymmetry during reward anticipation) w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
246
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(261 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
10
246
5
Order By: Relevance
“…(Sherdell et al 2012). In addition, individuals with depression or with a family history of depression show reduced frontal EEG asymmetries during reward anticipation (Shankman et al 2007(Shankman et al , 2013Nelson et al 2013Nelson et al , 2014. Further, a recent meta-analysis on neural processing of rewards in depression found evidence for <reduced>?…”
Section: Reward Anticipationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…(Sherdell et al 2012). In addition, individuals with depression or with a family history of depression show reduced frontal EEG asymmetries during reward anticipation (Shankman et al 2007(Shankman et al , 2013Nelson et al 2013Nelson et al , 2014. Further, a recent meta-analysis on neural processing of rewards in depression found evidence for <reduced>?…”
Section: Reward Anticipationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The NPU task manipulates uncertainty regarding both IF (shock probability) and WHEN (shock timing) shocks will occur. The NPU task has been used to examine drug administration and deprivation effects on negative affective response 4,34 and etiological mechanisms in mood and anxiety disorders [22][23][24][41][42][43] . In other research, Curtin and colleagues have also developed variants of these cued threat tasks that precisely manipulate threat uncertainty about WHEN (shock timing) 5,29,44 ; WHERE (administration location on body for shock) 25 ; and HOW BAD (shock intensity) 7 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wealth of empirical studies strongly suggest that individuals with clinical and subclinical depression are impaired in their response to rewards both during the anticipatory (i.e., motivational) phase and during the consummatory (i.e., emotional) phase (for a detailed discussion about the distinction between these two phases, see Berridge and Robinson, 2003;Gard et al, 2006). Specifically, depressed individuals report less anticipated pleasure (e.g., Chentsova-Dutton and Hanley, 2010), show impaired reward-learning behavior (e.g., Huys et al, 2013;Liu et al, 2011;Vrieze et al, 2013), demonstrate impaired reward-related decision making (e.g., Kunisato et al, 2012;Treadway et al, 2012), have reduced activity in approach-related cortical regions (e.g., Shankman et al, 2013; for a review see Thibodeau et al, 2006), and show altered activity in reward-related brain regions (for a review see Zhang et al, 2013). Recently, we have shown reduced effort-related cardiovascular reactivity during goal pursuit in subclinical depression (Brinkmann and Franzen, 2013;Brinkmann et al, 2009;Brinkmann, 2015, 2016a).…”
Section: Reward Responsiveness In Depressionmentioning
confidence: 99%