This review of Janice Raymond's A Passion for Friends focuses on her strong sense of the individual and of individuality. However, and this is the central contention of my paper, her perspective is quite distinct from liberal individualism. It is also a compkx variation on the feminist concern with selves in relationships.One of the many themes which runs through Janice Raymond's A Passion for Friends' is a strong notion of individuality. This theme threads its way through all facets of Raymond's conception of the Self, with its unique cognitive emphasis and perfectionist norms, and it appears as well in her moderated version of relational and collectivist values.Even the typeface reveals Raymond's concern for individuality. Her text presents us visually with the "capitalized Self;" the word 'self' is capitalized every time it appears. Remarkably, the word 'other' is never capitalized, although 'Gydaffection' is. This might be cause for some initial concern. Theorizing of this sort runs the risk of backsliding into a kind of revisionist liberal feminism. I wondered, at first, whether the capitalized Self is a thin disguise for the capitalist Self. Is it the abstracted, self-interested, mutually disinterested, utility-maximizing, game theoretic, rational agent of modern liberal thought? The answer is a clear "no." Raymond offers us the cautious promise of a feminist renewal of individuality. Her conception might well be called "individuality without individualism. "Raymond's insistence on the importance of individuality is always related to contexts of female friendship and women's communities. It is the individual woman in relationships who occupies Raymond's attention. This emphasis is quite explicit in her discussion of the value of women's religious communities. Convent life "at its best" features what Raymond considers an "instrucHypntiu vol. 3, no. 2 (Summer 1988) 0 by Marilyn Friedman