2019
DOI: 10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33011584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A PSPACE Subclass of Dependency Quantified Boolean Formulas and Its Effective Solving

Abstract: Dependency quantified Boolean formulas (DQBFs) are a powerful formalism, which subsumes quantified Boolean formulas (QBFs) and allows an explicit specification of dependencies of existential variables on universal variables. This enables a succinct encoding of decision problems in the NEXPTIME complexity class. As solving general DQBFs is NEXPTIME complete, in contrast to the PSPACE completeness of QBF solving, characterizing DQBF subclasses of lower computational complexity allows their effective solving and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evaluating DQBF is NEXPTIME complete [3] in general, but some tractable subclasses have been identified in recent work [38,17].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluating DQBF is NEXPTIME complete [3] in general, but some tractable subclasses have been identified in recent work [38,17].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A DQBF with modular dependency sets can be rewritten as a QBF with a Σ 3 prefix (Scholl et al 2019). An inspection of the proof shows that the rewriting preserves primal treewidth.…”
Section: Modularity and Backdoorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, in order to achieve tractability, it is natural to combine primal treewidth with a measure that bounds the complexity of the interactions between the dependency sets. A suitable "base case" for such a parameterization is the previously studied class of DQBFs which require each pair of dependency sets to be either disjoint or equal (Scholl et al 2019); here, we refer to these as modular DQBFs. A natural parameter that suggests itself at this point is the total number of "omissions" from the dependency sets of a DQBF required to achieve modularity; this matches the notion of (deletion) backdoors (Williams, Gomes, and Selman 2003) whose size has been used as a parameter in the SAT, CSP, and QBF settings (Gaspers and Szeider 2012;Gaspers et al 2014;Samer and Szeider 2009a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unfortunately, the completeness part is incorrect. Nevertheless, fork extension is useful for deciding certain non-trivial subclasses of DQBF [66].…”
Section: Resolution and Universal Expansionmentioning
confidence: 99%