2003
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.87.5.560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A prospective study of the rate of falls before and after cataract surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
58
3
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(16 reference statements)
1
58
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Only six of these fell in the 6 months after surgery, along with two who had not previously fallen. 33 We have no easy explanation for the difference between these results and ours.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…Only six of these fell in the 6 months after surgery, along with two who had not previously fallen. 33 We have no easy explanation for the difference between these results and ours.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…As well as the decrease in selfconfidence, low self-esteem and fear of falling triggered after the falls are feelings that guide the elderly after the accident (28) . The fear of falling and the falls are common syndromes with potentially serious outcomes among the elderly (29) . Surgical treatment of cataract has a positive impact on the quality of vision, allowing patients and perform well their usual (30) and work (31) activities, and reducing the occurrence of falls, especially after surgery of the first eye (32,33) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It did also note other flaws of these studies: confounding variables were not adequately controlled for; both trials had insufficient power; and 10.7% of cases were lost to follow-up secondary to death, patient withdrawal from the study, and patients undergoing surgery outside the study. 15 Brannan et al 13 reported a statistically significant decrease in the rate of falls after cataract surgery when compared with the rate of falls preoperatively in 31 patients (OR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.0092 to Ͼ0.32). Fall incidence was determined by patient diary recordings and telephone calls.…”
Section: ͻ001mentioning
confidence: 99%