1975
DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.1975.24.188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Prospective Study of the Effects of Ultralow Volume (ULV) Aerial Application of Malathion on Epidemic Plasmodium falciparum Malaria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Malathion was sprayed at a dosage of 4.5 fluid ounces per acre in the morning. The spray reduced the populations of adult A. albimanus to less than 1 % of pre-spray levels and interrupted epidemic transmission of P. falciparum malaria [ 78 ]. Prior to spraying, the incidence of malaria was similar in sprayed and unsprayed areas (176.1 and 198.7 cases/month/10,000 population, respectively).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Malathion was sprayed at a dosage of 4.5 fluid ounces per acre in the morning. The spray reduced the populations of adult A. albimanus to less than 1 % of pre-spray levels and interrupted epidemic transmission of P. falciparum malaria [ 78 ]. Prior to spraying, the incidence of malaria was similar in sprayed and unsprayed areas (176.1 and 198.7 cases/month/10,000 population, respectively).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vector abundance, biting contact, and survivorship are fundamental quantifiable parameters, expected to be in a positive-linear relationship with arbovirus transmission frequency 49 . Robust field evidence suggested that ULV applications suppressing vector populations led to the immediate decline of transmission incidence in the following four weeks 50 , while a rebound effect on the population was observed afterward. We found that more than 87.4% of total blood-engorged mosquitoes belonged to the genera Culex and Aedes , with Ae.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In outside environments, factors such as tree canopy and buildings have been shown to reduce aerosol penetration (Mount et al 1970a;Taylor et al 1975;Perich et al 1992Perich et al , 2000. However, information on how speciÞc physical features inside buildings impact aerosol insecticide dispersal is limited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%