Abstract:This study demonstrates the frequency of nerve injury during primary great saphenous vein surgery. It will be useful for clinicians providing informed consent and may provide a benchmark for comparison with newer techniques.
“…Other complications of surgery are nerve injury (7%) and deep vein thrombosis (Ͻ2%). [31][32][33][34][35][36] Because the sclerosant enters the deep venous system, UGFS may be associated with several specific complications such as migraine, temporal brain ischaemia, and scotomas, especially among patients with a foramen ovale. 37 As in surgery, most patients will experience ecchymosis and pain (often described as "a pulling chord") for 1 to 2 weeks after endovenous therapies.…”
In the absence of large, comparative randomized clinical trials, the minimally invasive techniques appear to be at least as effective as surgery in the treatment of lower extremity varicose veins.
“…Other complications of surgery are nerve injury (7%) and deep vein thrombosis (Ͻ2%). [31][32][33][34][35][36] Because the sclerosant enters the deep venous system, UGFS may be associated with several specific complications such as migraine, temporal brain ischaemia, and scotomas, especially among patients with a foramen ovale. 37 As in surgery, most patients will experience ecchymosis and pain (often described as "a pulling chord") for 1 to 2 weeks after endovenous therapies.…”
In the absence of large, comparative randomized clinical trials, the minimally invasive techniques appear to be at least as effective as surgery in the treatment of lower extremity varicose veins.
“…Nevertheless, stripping of the GSV to the knee level significantly reduces the risk of SNI, however, it does not eliminate it, as there is evidence that this could occur in a rate ranging from 5% to 27%. 1,6 Furthermore, recent studies have shown that the risk for trauma to this nerve should not be considered as a major deterrent to avoid a whole length GSV stripping as its adverse symptoms are gradually regressed postoperatively. 6,7 Motivated by the above contradicting opinions, we performed a prospective study in order to investigate the effect of stripping the below knee GSV segment on varicose vein recurrence and any disability induced after SNI during a 5-year period.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,6 Furthermore, recent studies have shown that the risk for trauma to this nerve should not be considered as a major deterrent to avoid a whole length GSV stripping as its adverse symptoms are gradually regressed postoperatively. 6,7 Motivated by the above contradicting opinions, we performed a prospective study in order to investigate the effect of stripping the below knee GSV segment on varicose vein recurrence and any disability induced after SNI during a 5-year period. This study is based on current guidelines for evaluating the treatment of chronic venous disease (CVD) 8,9 and presents a different approach to this controversial issue in the Journal of Vascular Surgery.…”
Though SNI may occur after both restricted and total GSV stripping, this does not influence limb disability since any related symptoms seem to regress in almost half of the limbs 5 years postoperatively. Additionally, it seems that recurrence could be reduced in the tibial area if the level of GSV stripping complies with the extent of the ultrosonographically proven GSV reflux. Therefore, the extent of GSV stripping should not be guided by the intent of avoiding SNI.
“…2 However, ligation and stripping has been associated with a range of adverse effects such as wound infection, haematoma, lymph leaks, pain, scarring, nerve injury, Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) and long post-operative recovery. [4][5][6][7] Conventional non-foam sclerotherapy, is considered faster but less effective than surgical stripping (hereafter, "surgery").…”
Article:Carroll, C. orcid.org/0000-0002-6361-6182, Hummel, S., Leaviss, J. orcid.org/0000-0002-5632-6021 et al. (4 more
ReuseUnless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version -refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher's website.
TakedownIf you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing eprints@whiterose.ac.uk including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request.
Type of publication:
Review
Keywords:Systematic review, cost-effectiveness, varicose veins, health technology assessment
AbstractBackground:
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.