2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2003.08.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A prospective study of continuous intravenous milrinone therapy for status IB patients awaiting heart transplant at home

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…17 For heart transplant candidates, home inotropes are useful and cost effective compared with hospitalization. 18,19 For some patients with end-stage HF, quality of life may be more important than quantity of life, and inotropes can be used for palliative care. 20 In light of the existing evidence, the 2013 guidelines from American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association recommend temporary intravenous inotropes for patients with cardiogenic shock until definite therapy or resolution of the precipitating problem (class I, level of evidence C), as a bridge to transplant or LVAD in candidates with refractory symptoms on oral and device therapy (class IIa, level of evidence C), and state that inotropes can be considered for palliative therapy or in hospitalized patients with low output state (class IIb, level of evidence B).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 For heart transplant candidates, home inotropes are useful and cost effective compared with hospitalization. 18,19 For some patients with end-stage HF, quality of life may be more important than quantity of life, and inotropes can be used for palliative care. 20 In light of the existing evidence, the 2013 guidelines from American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association recommend temporary intravenous inotropes for patients with cardiogenic shock until definite therapy or resolution of the precipitating problem (class I, level of evidence C), as a bridge to transplant or LVAD in candidates with refractory symptoms on oral and device therapy (class IIa, level of evidence C), and state that inotropes can be considered for palliative therapy or in hospitalized patients with low output state (class IIb, level of evidence B).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positive inotropic therapy has been shown to improve symptoms and functional ability [14][15][16], and continuous outpatient support with inotropes (COSI) has been used as support for patients awaiting transplantation and as well as palliative therapy for patients dying of refractory heart failure [14][15][16][17][18][19]. In our program, the use of COSI as palliative therapy in inotrope-dependent patients resulted in a median survival of 3.2 months [5] (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Noninvasive imaging to detect myocardial ischemia and viability is reasonable in HF and CAD IIa C Viability assessment is reasonable before revascularization in HF patients with CAD IIa B [281][282][283][284][285] Radionuclide ventriculography or MRI can be useful to assess LVEF and volume IIa C MRI is reasonable when assessing myocardial infiltration or scar IIa B [286][287][288] Routine repeat measurement of LV function assessment should not be performed III: No Benefit B e258 Circulation…”
Section: Noninvasive Cardiac Imaging: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…303 Although the results of the STICH (Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure) trial have cast doubt on the role of myocardial viability assessment to determine the mode of therapy, 304 the data are nevertheless predictive of a positive outcome. When these data are taken into consideration with multiple previous studies demonstrating the usefulness of this approach, [281][282][283][284][285] it becomes reasonable to recommend viability assessment when treating patients with HFrEF who have known CAD. 14 See Online Data Supplement 9 for additional data on imaging−echocardiography.…”
Section: October 15 2013mentioning
confidence: 99%