2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11897-007-0035-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of positive inotropes in end-of-life heart failure care

Abstract: End-stage heart failure is associated with mortality equivalent to cancer, yet there is little information about palliative therapy for this disease. Chronic outpatient support with inotropes provides symptomatic relief and life extension for those select patients demonstrating dependence on positive inotropic therapy. The purpose of this review is to provide information about process and implementation of chronic outpatient support with inotropes in patients with end-stage heart failure.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Inotropic agents may also be indicated as bridge to heart transplant or mechanical assist device implantation or as palliation for symptoms in end-stage HF. 17 These indications are in agreement with the European Society of Cardiology guidelines, which state that inotropic agents are indicated for patients with low SBP or a low measured cardiac index in the presence of signs of hypoperfusion or congestion. They also state that inotropic agents should be reserved for patients with dilated, hypokinetic ventricles and, when indicated, should be administered as early as possible and discontinued as soon as organ perfusion is restored and/or congestion is reduced.…”
Section: Inotropic Therapy In Current Guidelinessupporting
confidence: 81%
“…1 Inotropic agents may also be indicated as bridge to heart transplant or mechanical assist device implantation or as palliation for symptoms in end-stage HF. 17 These indications are in agreement with the European Society of Cardiology guidelines, which state that inotropic agents are indicated for patients with low SBP or a low measured cardiac index in the presence of signs of hypoperfusion or congestion. They also state that inotropic agents should be reserved for patients with dilated, hypokinetic ventricles and, when indicated, should be administered as early as possible and discontinued as soon as organ perfusion is restored and/or congestion is reduced.…”
Section: Inotropic Therapy In Current Guidelinessupporting
confidence: 81%
“…18,19 For some patients with end-stage HF, quality of life may be more important than quantity of life, and inotropes can be used for palliative care. 20 In light of the existing evidence, the 2013 guidelines from American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association recommend temporary intravenous inotropes for patients with cardiogenic shock until definite therapy or resolution of the precipitating problem (class I, level of evidence C), as a bridge to transplant or LVAD in candidates with refractory symptoms on oral and device therapy (class IIa, level of evidence C), and state that inotropes can be considered for palliative therapy or in hospitalized patients with low output state (class IIb, level of evidence B). 21 In our study, with contemporary HF management, patients who had inotrope-dependent advanced HF but were not candidates for heart transplant or LVAD had a median survival of 9 months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 It is associated with recurrent hospitalisation for HF exacerbations 2 and the need for intravenous vasoactive treatment that becomes increasingly frequent. [5][6][7] In our prior publication, we found high mortality mirroring that of western fi gures among unselect cohort of HF patients. 8 In end-stage HF not eligible for heart transplantation or destination mechanical assist device, palliative care complementing a chronic disease management programme serves to optimise symptom controls and address multiple domains of patient and family distress, [9][10][11] albeit some defi ciencies in hard clinical evidence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%