1987
DOI: 10.1200/jco.1987.5.10.1559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A prospective randomized trial of 5-fluorouracil versus 5-fluorouracil and high-dose leucovorin versus 5-fluorouracil and methotrexate in previously untreated patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma.

Abstract: Seventy-four previously untreated patients with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma were prospectively randomized into one of three treatment regimens: (1) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 450 mg/m2 as an intravenous (IV) bolus daily for five days or toxicity, then 200 mg/m2 IV bolus every other day for six doses; (2) methotrexate (MTX) 50 mg/m2 in normal saline by IV infusion over four hours followed by an IV bolus of 5-FU 600 mg/m2. This was administered weekly for 4 weeks and then every 2 weeks. (3) Leucovorin 500 mg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
101
2
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 417 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
101
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The risk of higher grade toxicities was substantially lower. As a comparison Petrelli et al reported diarrhoea in 40% of the patients with 26% needing hospitalization for rehydration [23]. The 4/37 patients with a grade 3/4 neutropenia was less than the 17 % reported by Louvet et al in advanced colorectal cancer [24].…”
Section: Tolerabilitymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The risk of higher grade toxicities was substantially lower. As a comparison Petrelli et al reported diarrhoea in 40% of the patients with 26% needing hospitalization for rehydration [23]. The 4/37 patients with a grade 3/4 neutropenia was less than the 17 % reported by Louvet et al in advanced colorectal cancer [24].…”
Section: Tolerabilitymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The most consistently active agent for this disease has been 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and most regimens have been based on this agent (Table 2). [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] Few studies, and certainly none of the most recent studies, have specifically examined the role of systemic chemotherapy for resectable liver disease. However, it is clear that for most chemotherapeutic regimens, less than one third of patients with liver metastases have shown any response.…”
Section: Results Of Medical Treatment Of Isolated Liver Metastatic DImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the reason that therapeutic effectiveness diminished following the multiple-line chemotherapies because of drug resistance or the decreased tumor response, we make our decision in first-line treatment regimen with cautious consideration. According to the latest NCCN (The National Comprehensive Cancer Network) clinical practice guidelines in Oncology version 1.2013, five chemotherapy regimens including FOLFOX (Tournigand et al, 2004), FOLFIRI (Tournigand et al, 2004;Colucci et al, 2005), CapeOx (Cassidy et al, 2004;Porschen et al, 2007;Cassidy et al, 2008), infusional 5-FU/LV or capecitabine (Petrelli et al, 1987;Jager et al, 1996) and FOLFOXIRI (Souglakos et al, 2006;Falcone et al, 2007) are recommended as the first-line treatment in metastatic CRCs. FOLFOX is the most common regimen.…”
Section: Serum Mir-19a Predicts Resistance To Folfox Chemotherapy In mentioning
confidence: 99%