2017
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A prospective comparative assessment of the accuracy of the FibroScan in evaluating liver steatosis

Abstract: Background/aimsRecent studies have demonstrated the utility of the FibroScan® device in diagnosing liver steatosis, but its usefulness has not been thoroughly appraised. We investigated the usefulness of the controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) in detecting and quantifying liver steatosis.MethodsA prospective analysis was applied to 79 chronic liver disease patients who underwent a liver biopsy, a FibroScan investigation, ultrasonography, and hepatic steatosis index (HSI). The presence and degree of steatosi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
26
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As NAFLD/NASH can lead to serious liver‐ and cardiovascular related complications, this should be assessed in all pNET patients approximately 1 year after pancreatic resection. Controlled attenuated parameter (CAP) has proven to be an accurate non‐invasive alternative to liver biopsy for diagnosis of NAFLD/NASH and could be used in the pre‐ and postoperative assessment of hepatic steatosis. Therefore we suggest that further research with long‐term follow‐up should focus on prospective pre‐ and postoperative liver evaluation with CAP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As NAFLD/NASH can lead to serious liver‐ and cardiovascular related complications, this should be assessed in all pNET patients approximately 1 year after pancreatic resection. Controlled attenuated parameter (CAP) has proven to be an accurate non‐invasive alternative to liver biopsy for diagnosis of NAFLD/NASH and could be used in the pre‐ and postoperative assessment of hepatic steatosis. Therefore we suggest that further research with long‐term follow‐up should focus on prospective pre‐ and postoperative liver evaluation with CAP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also lacked cross sectional imaging such as MRI, which has the highest sensitivity for detecting hepatic steatosis [42]. However, CAP is an FDA-approved ultrasound-based modality for characterizing the presence and severity of hepatic steatosis, and the threshold used to define steatosis has shown high correlation with histologically-confirmed steatosis [26]. In the current study there were too few women to evaluate ethnic differences in liver biopsy measures of NASH, however, existing data on biopsy-confirmed NASH in PCOS are currently quite limited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TE-CAP (FibroScan®, Echosens, Paris, France) is a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved, non-invasive method for evaluating hepatic fibrosis and steatosis that is validated in NAFLD [25]. Our secondary outcome was presence of steatosis by CAP defined as CAP score > 250 dB/m, given the high concordance of this threshold with biopsy-confirmed steatosis [26]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CAP is only influenced by the steatosis stage. Several reports have stated cut-off values for CAP [13]. The cut-off value of CAP for detecting hepatic steatosis of ≥5% is 247-250 dB/m, and that of ≥10% is 210-283 dB/m; this value differs depending on the reports.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%