“…The HIT was commended on its excellent reliability for a performance-based technique ( Holtzman et al, 1961 ; Gamble, 1972 ; Holtzman, 1975 ; Anastasi, 1982 ; Lilienfeld et al, 2000 ; Holtzman and Swartz, 2003 ; Darolia, 2016 ), its ability to differentiate individuals with psychopathology from healthy controls and among different psychopathologies ( Holtzman et al, 1961 ; Moseley, 1963 ; Megargee and Velez-Diaz, 1971 ; Leichsenring, 1990 , 1991 ; Darolia, 2016 ), its sensitivity to detect the developmental changes across the lifespan ( Thorpe and Swartz, 1965 , 1966 ; Swartz et al, 1967 ; Darolia, 2016 ), its maintaining a constant number of total responses to the protocols ( Lilienfeld et al, 2000 ), and for the possibility of group administration ( Darolia, 2016 ; Holtzman, 1988 ; Panek et al, 1983 ). All these features represent advantages over the Rorschach in research and clinical assessment, especially when it comes to a situation, where many subjects have to be tested (e.g., academic, job, and military selection).…”