2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2009.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A process to design a network of marine no-take areas: Lessons from the Great Barrier Reef

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The entire RAP planning program that led to the 2003 Zoning Plan was wide-ranging and comprehensive (Fernandes et al 2009;Day 2011). It was, at the time, the most comprehensive program of public participation for any planning task in the GBR and possibly in Australia, extending over four years and costing an estimated AUD$12 million (Osmond et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The entire RAP planning program that led to the 2003 Zoning Plan was wide-ranging and comprehensive (Fernandes et al 2009;Day 2011). It was, at the time, the most comprehensive program of public participation for any planning task in the GBR and possibly in Australia, extending over four years and costing an estimated AUD$12 million (Osmond et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spatial allocation of marine reserves in the GBR in 2004 was conducted with knowledge of the biophysical regime (Fernandes et al 2009). One of these principles was to maximise the use of environmental information to determine the configuration of no-take areas to form viable networks.…”
Section: Application To Gbr Conservationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of these principles was to maximise the use of environmental information to determine the configuration of no-take areas to form viable networks. However, the requisite data was inadequate and the theoretical framework for accommodating the spatial configuration was lacking (Fernandes et al 2009). As a consequence, the reserve allocation process was primarily focused on the capture of representative biodiversity within a reserve system (Kerrigan et al 2010) without attention to metapopulation processes.…”
Section: Application To Gbr Conservationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Networks offer the theoretical promise of achieving goals that single small protected areas cannot accomplish, such as protecting a broader variety of habitat types and facilitating connectivity among sites to sustain threatened populations. Processes to plan and implement networks of marine reserves have taken place in areas such as California (34,35), the Great Barrier Reef, Australia (36,37), and the Central Visayas Region in the Philippines (38, 39), the first two of which are the subject of contributions in this Special Feature. Additional networks are being implemented, planned, or discussed throughout the world.…”
Section: Emerging Research Frontiersmentioning
confidence: 99%