2003
DOI: 10.1108/02602280310496827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A process to control diaphragm thickness with a provision for back to front alignment in the fabrication of polysilicon piezoresistive pressure sensor

Abstract: A MEMS process is described to control diaphragm thickness with an integrated provision for back to front alignment in the fabrication of a polysilicon piezoresistive pressure sensor. The end point detection for the diaphragm etching is suitably incorporated in the process so that it is also used for the back-to-front alignment. The proposed process is cost-effective and suitable for the batch fabrication of the pressure sensor.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of surfactant in a TMAH solution [20] was avoided in order to rule out any contamination to biological activities on the cantilever surface. Through holes within the wafer were used for alignment purposes [28].…”
Section: Microfabrication Stepsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of surfactant in a TMAH solution [20] was avoided in order to rule out any contamination to biological activities on the cantilever surface. Through holes within the wafer were used for alignment purposes [28].…”
Section: Microfabrication Stepsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A double‐sided mask aligning system is one solution, which is not cost effective. A novel and cost effective procedure has been used for this purpose (Akhtar et al , 2003b). The method is also useful to control the diaphragm thickness in addition to provide facility for back to front alignment.…”
Section: Fabrication Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discovery of piezoresistivity in silicon and germanium (Smith, 1954) and subsequent development for anisotropic etching of crystalline silicon (Bean, 1978; Petersen, 1982) has enabled the production of semiconductor‐based sensors (Hashimoto, 1999; Pryputniewicz et al , 2000). Advances in microfabrication technology have led to the development of bulk‐micromachined (Mosser et al , 1991; Akhtar et al , 2003; Ahmad et al , 2003) and surface‐micromachined (Guckel, 1991) sensors available today. The first micromechanical sensor was the piezoresistive pressure sensor, which was developed at Bell Labs in 1960.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%