17th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/itsc.2014.6957809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A procedure for urban route travel time forecast based on advanced traffic data: Case study of Rome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of FCD for traffic modelling and travel demand estimation is widely discussed in literature [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. For the scope of this study, FCD were used to estimate the Origin-Destination (O-D) matrices following the procedure intro-duced by Eisemann and List [26] and refined by Carrese et al [27] and Nigro et al [28].…”
Section: Traflc Simulation From Fcdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of FCD for traffic modelling and travel demand estimation is widely discussed in literature [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. For the scope of this study, FCD were used to estimate the Origin-Destination (O-D) matrices following the procedure intro-duced by Eisemann and List [26] and refined by Carrese et al [27] and Nigro et al [28].…”
Section: Traflc Simulation From Fcdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…eRCNN achieves the best traffic flow prediction accuracy on all I5 freeway sections. 10 eRLSTM and eRCNN+LSTM also achieve good accuracy when predicting the traffic flow. However, these two models can be outperformed by the LSTM under certain scenarios.…”
Section: Traffic Predictionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The results also show that LSTM outperforms all other models that do not utilize the error feedback. 10 It is interesting to observe that while LSTM outperformed CNN for both traffic variables, eRCNN outperforms eRLSTM. The error feedback has then a more positive effect on CNN models than on LSTM ones.…”
Section: Traffic Predictionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…neural networks [9][10][11][12] or Kalman modelling [13], fusing additional data sources e.g. automatic license plate recognition [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%