2014
DOI: 10.13182/nse12-81
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Priori Deterministic Computational-Cost Optimization of Weight-Dependent Variance-Reduction Parameters for Monte Carlo Neutral-Particle Transport

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TPS dosimetry calculations are based on pre-calculated MC dosimetry data acquired with the 192 Ir source centred in specific phantom geometries. TPS cannot account any changes in scatter conditions imposed by phantom geometry condition and source dwell positions at different distances in phantom boundary while that is possible in the MC simulation [20][21][22][23]. Currently utilized commercial TPS ignores not only the effect of tissue heterogeneity within the patient, but also it denies the effect of the finite patient volume.…”
Section: Results Phantom Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…TPS dosimetry calculations are based on pre-calculated MC dosimetry data acquired with the 192 Ir source centred in specific phantom geometries. TPS cannot account any changes in scatter conditions imposed by phantom geometry condition and source dwell positions at different distances in phantom boundary while that is possible in the MC simulation [20][21][22][23]. Currently utilized commercial TPS ignores not only the effect of tissue heterogeneity within the patient, but also it denies the effect of the finite patient volume.…”
Section: Results Phantom Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We employed the MCNP 4C version, which was released in 1999 and has a prominent capability of geometric modeling and calculating dose distribution within the human body. This code uses a three-dimensional (3D) geometry and transports neutron, photon, and electrons in the energy range from 1 keV to 1 GeV for simulation [20][21][22][23]. Low energy phenomena, such as characteristic X-ray and Auger electrons, are accurately modeled.…”
Section: Monte Carlo Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the FTEs were developed to estimate the computational cost for transport and these variance-reduction techniques in the MCNP code. With that, [58,59] also demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach and a tool created to carry it out.…”
Section: Solomon Schultis Booth and Soodmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In 2010, the history-score-moment equations were generalized by Solomon, Schultis, Booth, and Sood to treat weight-dependent variance-reduction techniques (most notably: weight windows) as described in [58,59]. Weight-dependent transport kernels for weight windows were derived (and other transport kernels for importance splitting, rouletting, weight cutoff, and implicit capture were re-derived).…”
Section: Solomon Schultis Booth and Soodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Becker and Larsen showed that there is no rigorous mathematical link between the FOM and the Monte Carlo particle distribution, though the improvement in the FOM from a higher particle population is observable. Solomon et al 68 proposed a method to optimize the FOM by calculating the tally variance and the average computational time per history, thereby directly optimizing the FOM. This method is called the Cost Optimized Variance Reduction Technique (COVRT).…”
Section: Other Vr Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%