1992
DOI: 10.1016/0093-691x(92)90058-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A preliminary study of growth, serum prolactin and reproductive performance of beef heifers grazing -infected tall fescue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2) may be a major contributing factor to the lack of negative effect on reproductive performance. As with our study, Fanning et al (1992) reported suppressed serum prolactin levels and decreased ADG of heifers grazing E+, but observed no effect of grazing E+ on ovarian activity, synchronized estrous response or pregnancy rate of heifers exposed to E+ for 100 d prior to insemination. Their study was conducted from November to March when alkaloid concentrations are usually low (Kallenbach et al, 2003;Drewnoski et al, 2007) and ambient temperatures are cool.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2) may be a major contributing factor to the lack of negative effect on reproductive performance. As with our study, Fanning et al (1992) reported suppressed serum prolactin levels and decreased ADG of heifers grazing E+, but observed no effect of grazing E+ on ovarian activity, synchronized estrous response or pregnancy rate of heifers exposed to E+ for 100 d prior to insemination. Their study was conducted from November to March when alkaloid concentrations are usually low (Kallenbach et al, 2003;Drewnoski et al, 2007) and ambient temperatures are cool.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Studies evaluating the effects of E+ on pregnancy rate have been conducted with variable results. Some studies have reported cows or heifers consuming E+ have reduced pregnancy rates (Schmidt et al, 1986;Beers and Piper, 1987;Gay et al, 1988) while others have reported no difference (Fanning et al, 1992;Burke et al, 2001b;Burke and Rorie, 2002;Watson et al, 2004). The discrepancies in E+ effect on pregnancy rate may be related to differences in experimental conditions including the amount of ergot alkaloid consumed and environmental temperature during the breeding period.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Serum prolactin concentrations were not different between treatments; however, from early summer to late fall, prolactin concentrations decreased. In previous literature, cattle grazing toxic endophyte-infected tall fescue also had experienced this seasonal effect with reduced serum prolactin levels over similar times ( Fanning et al, 1992 ; Aiken et al, 2013 ; Stowe et al, 2013 ; Shoup et al, 2016 ). This indicates that all heifers, in this experiment were experiencing fescue toxicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…It is possible that the reproductive system of the cow is often robust enough to withstand the effects of grazing E+ tall fescue even when other symptoms such as decreased PRL and BW gain are evident. Fanning et al (1992) observed this in a study with heifers fed E+ tall fescue, which exhibited decreased serum PRL and weight gain without any negative effect on reproductive performance. This also seemed to be the case in the current study, as reproductive performance was generally good in both the E+ and AR542 groups despite lower BW gain, condition score, and serum PRL in the E+ group, indicating that toxicosis was present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%