1950
DOI: 10.2307/1438501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Preliminary Report on the Venom Apparatus of the Bat-Ray, Holorhinus californicus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1953
1953
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In cross section, the stings are convex and broadly rounded dorsally, without a median longitudinal dorsal groove that is present in extant stingrays (e.g., Dasyatis, Myliobatis;Halstead and Modglin, 1950). Ventrally, the two longitudinal grooves extend almost the entire length of the sting on both sides of the elevated ventral median ridge (these are particularly pronounced in the holotype, where the stings are ventrally exposed).…”
Section: Appendicular Skeletonmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In cross section, the stings are convex and broadly rounded dorsally, without a median longitudinal dorsal groove that is present in extant stingrays (e.g., Dasyatis, Myliobatis;Halstead and Modglin, 1950). Ventrally, the two longitudinal grooves extend almost the entire length of the sting on both sides of the elevated ventral median ridge (these are particularly pronounced in the holotype, where the stings are ventrally exposed).…”
Section: Appendicular Skeletonmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The caudal stings are enveloped in an epidermal sheath in extant stingrays. This sheath contains blood vessels ventrally, adjacent to the longitudinal ridges of the stings, and glandular epithelium towards its periphery, which is responsible for the production of venom (Halstead and Modglin, 1950;Halstead, 1970). The caudal sting is already formed by parturition in extant stingrays (although present, it is slightly less acute in embryos), and this was the case in †Asterotrygon as the fetus preserved inside the holotype has a small (13 mm in length) sting that is fully formed (fig.…”
Section: Appendicular Skeletonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to differences in anatomy, spine material varies, and affects the overall mechanics. Both lionfish and stingray spines are made of mineralized collagen, a combination of hydroxyapatite and collagen (Halstead and Modglin, 1950;Halstead et al, 1955). However, the mechanical properties of lionfish and stingray spines remain unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biomechanical properties have only been examined for stingers (bees, wasps and scorpions), where venom is delivered through the middle of the spine (Zhao et al, 2015;Zhao et al, 2016). Lionfish spines, similar to those of stingrays, have venom glands and grooves that line the sides of the spine, whereas in bees, wasps and scorpions, venom flows through the middle (Halstead and Modglin, 1950;Halstead et al, 1955). Venom delivery morphologies in combination with material composition may affect the properties of the spine under various loading regimes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lionfish ( Figure 1b) dorsal spines are made of dentine, which is a composite of hydroxyapatite and collagen [11][12][13]. Stingray ( Figure 1c) stings are also composed of dentine [14,15]. Spines and quills found in hedgehogs, porcupines (Figure 1d), and echidnas ( Figure 1e) are made of keratin and are believed to have evolved from hair [16,17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%