Abstract:Background and Objectives: Clinical reasoning is developed sometime during medical school training. When and how this knowledge is attained is less clear. This study looks at clinical reasoning development after initiation of a rural experiential course for first-year medical students at the University of Minnesota Medical School, Duluth (regional) Campus. Methods: The Rural Medical Scholars Program course (RMSP) was developed to create a longitudinal rural family medicine experience for first and second-year … Show more
“…Education in CR is crucial in the early preclinical stage, as it lays the foundation for medical students' clinical competence, particularly in decision making for later clinical training [14]. It is important that student preparation for clinical encounters be improved to minimize diagnostic errors and negative consequences [15][16][17]. The pedagogy consisted of small group work guided by preceptors, large group lectures, case-based learning, and asynchronous individual work [14].…”
Background: The development of clinical reasoning (CR) abilities in Thai medical students during their pre-clinical years lacked well-designed establishment. Methods: This study utilized a pre-test and post-test design without a control group and was conducted at Walailak University, Thailand, in May 2022. We collected participant baseline characteristics and compared scores evaluated by the instructor and participants before and after the intervention. Additionally, we conducted a post-intervention survey on workshop satisfaction, perspectives on CR, and its learning impact. Results: Nineteen third-year medical students were included in the analysis, and twelve (63.2%) were women. The mean age was 20.6 years (standard deviation, SD: 0.5). The total score evaluated by the instructor after the intervention (8.95; SD, 1.81) was significantly higher than that before the intervention (1.68; SD, 0.67), p < 0.001. The total score evaluated by the participants after the intervention (8.22; SD = 1.44) was significantly higher than that before the intervention (2.34; SD, 2.06), p < 0.001. Overall, satisfaction was high. Conclusions: A short interactive workshop effectively taught CR principles and practice to Thai third-year medical students. These findings support the possibility of implementing this in pre-clinical curricula to prepare them for clinical practice.
“…Education in CR is crucial in the early preclinical stage, as it lays the foundation for medical students' clinical competence, particularly in decision making for later clinical training [14]. It is important that student preparation for clinical encounters be improved to minimize diagnostic errors and negative consequences [15][16][17]. The pedagogy consisted of small group work guided by preceptors, large group lectures, case-based learning, and asynchronous individual work [14].…”
Background: The development of clinical reasoning (CR) abilities in Thai medical students during their pre-clinical years lacked well-designed establishment. Methods: This study utilized a pre-test and post-test design without a control group and was conducted at Walailak University, Thailand, in May 2022. We collected participant baseline characteristics and compared scores evaluated by the instructor and participants before and after the intervention. Additionally, we conducted a post-intervention survey on workshop satisfaction, perspectives on CR, and its learning impact. Results: Nineteen third-year medical students were included in the analysis, and twelve (63.2%) were women. The mean age was 20.6 years (standard deviation, SD: 0.5). The total score evaluated by the instructor after the intervention (8.95; SD, 1.81) was significantly higher than that before the intervention (1.68; SD, 0.67), p < 0.001. The total score evaluated by the participants after the intervention (8.22; SD = 1.44) was significantly higher than that before the intervention (2.34; SD, 2.06), p < 0.001. Overall, satisfaction was high. Conclusions: A short interactive workshop effectively taught CR principles and practice to Thai third-year medical students. These findings support the possibility of implementing this in pre-clinical curricula to prepare them for clinical practice.
“…[6][7][8][9] The emphasis on how to teach clinical reasoning started in medical education and to assess the results, diagnostic thinking inventory (DTI) was used for rating Standardized patients (SP). 10,12 In dentistry, a few studies exist on clinical reasoning skills demonstrating them through clinical scenarios, but none shows a definite pattern/ definite tool to assess. 13,14 In medical sciences, the learning and developing of clinical reasoning skills is a topic on which a lot of work has been done.…”
Objective: To assess the clinical reasoning skills among dental students, and to compare the diagnostic thinking ability of male and female students.
Method: The cross-sectional study was conducted from May to July 2021 at a public-sector dental school in Karachi, and comprised students of both genders from across all the four years of dental school. Data was collected using the diagnostic thinking inventory which also assessed flexibility in thinking and knowledge structure in memory. Data was analysed using SPSS 18.
Results: Of the 111 forms distributed, 108(98.2%) were received duly filled; 32(29.35%) from male students and 76(69.72) from female students. Participants from the first year were 24(22%), second year 23(21%), third year 33(30.27%) and the fourth year 29(26.6%). The reliability of diagnostic thinking inventory was 0.906, for knowledge structure in memory 0.661, and flexibility in thinking 0.573. The correlation was significant for students in their 2nd, 3rd and 4th years of studies (p=0.01) The overall mean score was <150 which was poor. Both the knowledge structure in memory, and flexibility in thinking scores were higher for females compared to males (Significant at the level of 0.01).
Conclusion: The clinical reasoning skills of students were low, and the diagnostic thinking ability of female students was better than that of their male counterparts.
Key Words: Students, Dental Schools, Dental, Problem-based Learning, Clinical Competence, Clinical reasoning.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.