2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-92529-1_67
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Pragmatic Model for Alumina Feeding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…: value set based on estimated bubble size in a pilot-scale degassers[26,27]; 2 assuming particle diameter d p = 0.54 µm[28].Combining the results from the literature and our experimental observations, it is indicated that there are other mechanisms which play a more dominant role in TiB 2 removal during degassing process, and such mechanisms may not be related to bubble flotation mechanisms. One of the mechanisms worth noting was proposed byKhorasani [17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…: value set based on estimated bubble size in a pilot-scale degassers[26,27]; 2 assuming particle diameter d p = 0.54 µm[28].Combining the results from the literature and our experimental observations, it is indicated that there are other mechanisms which play a more dominant role in TiB 2 removal during degassing process, and such mechanisms may not be related to bubble flotation mechanisms. One of the mechanisms worth noting was proposed byKhorasani [17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 52%
“…So far, a comparison of the experimental data with the deterministic flotation model is rarely found in the context of aluminum melt. Under appropriate assumptions of the TiB 2 particle and bubble size [26][27][28], an evaluation of the analytical deterministic flotation model is made and the results are listed in Table 4. By comparing the k f values listed in Table 4 with the removal rate constant of TiB 2 given in Figure 5a-c, it can be seen that the conventional flotation model estimates the inclusion removal rate constant to be ca.…”
Section: Influence Of Impeller Rotation Speed On Tib 2 Removal Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%