2019
DOI: 10.3390/en12112088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Practical Method for Speeding up the Cavitation Prediction in an Industrial Double-Suction Centrifugal Pump

Abstract: Researches have over the past few years have been applying optimization algorithms to quickly find optimum parameter combinations during cavitation optimization design. This method, although better than the traditional trial-and-error design method, consumes lots of computational resources, since it involves several numerical simulations to determine the critical cavitation point for each test case. As such, the Traditional method for NPSHr prediction was compared to a novel and alternative approach in an axia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fluid flow through the pipeline and centrifugal pump is controlled by the valve, which determines the discharge head and suction head. The suction head influences the fluid flow pressure, while the discharge head determines the fluid flow rate [21]. The fluid flow through the test pipe returns to the storage tank.…”
Section: Experimental Methods Of Centrifugal Pump Impeller Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fluid flow through the pipeline and centrifugal pump is controlled by the valve, which determines the discharge head and suction head. The suction head influences the fluid flow pressure, while the discharge head determines the fluid flow rate [21]. The fluid flow through the test pipe returns to the storage tank.…”
Section: Experimental Methods Of Centrifugal Pump Impeller Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is has been done in the previous studies [26]. Figure 7 compares the time-averaged transient simulation results at an impeller rotation of 3°with the experimental test results.…”
Section: Validation Of Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Afterwards, the discharge valve was gradually shut, and the power was cut to shut down the pump. e experimental process had a measurement uncertainty of ±0.411%, based on the Type B approach for evaluation of experimental uncertainty [26].…”
Section: Validation Of Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where P t1 denotes the inlet total pressure. Meanwhile, Pei et al 10 applied flow rate and static pressure as the boundary conditions of inlet and outlet with developed specific algorithms to avoid repeated analysis, however, there were still some issues regarding confirmation of convergence.…”
Section: Cavitation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The changes in flow rate affect the incidence angle, meaning that the pressure (head) of the cavity inception is the lowest at a certain incidence angle. [8][9][10] Moreover, Zhu et al 11 analyzed the effect of the incidence angle on the cavitation phenomenon as a correlation with a difference of hydrofoil setting angles. Christopher et al 5 designed the impeller leading edge (LE) into the square, ellipse, and circular shapes, respectively, to investigate that the shape of the impeller LE is related to the inlet flow and cavitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%