2013
DOI: 10.1137/110854771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Posteriori Error Estimates and Adaptive Mesh Refinement for the Coupling of the Finite Volume Method and the Boundary Element Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The last term of the indicator measures the error of the Cauchy data through the Calderón system. The local efficiency of our estimator and thus a lower bound for our energy norm error benefits from the results of [16,18]. More precisely, the results in these papers can be transferred directly to our refinement indicator and we only show an upper bound for the quantities, which include the additional discrete interpolation on the coupling boundary.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The last term of the indicator measures the error of the Cauchy data through the Calderón system. The local efficiency of our estimator and thus a lower bound for our energy norm error benefits from the results of [16,18]. More precisely, the results in these papers can be transferred directly to our refinement indicator and we only show an upper bound for the quantities, which include the additional discrete interpolation on the coupling boundary.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…We stress that the computation can be done in linear complexity with respect to the number #T of elements and refer to [6] and [12, p. 18] for more details. The computation of u a and ς a in case of a coupling node a ∈ N Γ is more complicated and derived in [18] for Neumann boundary conditions and in [13,16] for a coupling problem; see Fig. 1.…”
Section: Approximation Of U On a Node A ∈ Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations